Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Protocols of Zion

Hide All / Expand All

Señor El Once : this didn't stop him from writing from his protocols ignorance


Mr. Felton wrote on August 1, 2012 at 12:20 pm:

I have not read the Protocols and am not prepared to comment on them since they have no relation to the events of Sept. 11.

Yet this didn't stop Mr. Felton from writing from his ignorance:

- on August 2, 2012 at 11:43 am

The Protocol angle is pure speculation.

- on August 1, 2012 at 9:34 pm:

The “Protocols” have nothing to do with Sept. 11.

- on August 1, 2012 at 11:54 pm

We do look ridiculous if we allow a thread about Sept. 11 to degenerate into a harangue about the “Protocols”.

- on August 1, 2012 at 12:20 pm again:

There is no way to prove cause-and-effect. I only write what I can prove, and the Protocols do not admit of proof. ... [Mr. Rogue] makes the strong argument for a cause and effect [between the Protocols and 9/11], and this he is not entitled to do. It is irresponsible. I will not pollute my research with anachronistic speculation, especially since it is not necessary to understand Israeli involvement.

Woa, woa, woa! This forum isn't Mr. Felton's research, so nothing has been polluted. I don't know where he -- as a new-comer to this forum albeit with 9/11 Vancoever Hearing level exposure -- can be dictating what anyone else is entitled to do, labeling it irresponsible, and recommending suspending posting privileges. [Flag is called on the play!]

He has made every single posting on the tangent Protocols theme from an admitted position of ignorance: he not having read them and not being prepared to write on them. How "irresponsible" is that?

The problem with 9/11 is that (by design) the 9/11 Truthers get bogged down in details (trees) and lose sight of the forest [that is being encroached on, clear cut, and poisoned.]

9/11 does not make a lot of sense until you step back and view history in larger chunks than Presidential Administrations. You have to view and span decades, which in turn imposes the necessity of looking at half-centuries sometimes for context as well. The decade since 9/11 has actually proven the agenda (blue print from PNAC) that required a 9/11 for instigation and fulfillment. And the agenda was in the works from before George Herbert Walker Bush was President (1988), was a conniving Vice-President in the Reagan years, was heading the CIA in 1976, and was in Texas on November 22, 1963.

There is truth to the statement regarding cause-and-effect lacking from detailed line items in the Protocols to specific events or anomalies on 9/11. When a wider view is taken that considers the passifying (e.g., media), enslaving (e.g., credit, junk food), and perversion (e.g., porno, "torture is okay", "USA! #1! USA! #1") of the masses, then the Protocols isn't so out of place in an intelligent discussion.

From nuclear weapons to multiple forms of Weapons of Mass Destruction to faux Cold Wars to enemy combatants, etc., none of it makes much sense until a blue print is provided that takes a long-term view.


Hide All / Expand All

Señor El Once : Protocol rabbit hole entrance


hybridrogue1 : know thy enemy


Señor El Once : only one way to accurately predict the future: to engineer it


No comments: