Hide All / Expand All
x177
Señor El Once : obsolete words for high school graduates
2013-09-04
{Disclaimer: Most links on obsolete words go here. Enjoy the re-deploy of today!}
Will wonders never cease?! Every wonder-wench and snoutfair who particpates here graduated from high school or the equivalent! From there, it is anyone's guess the rough and rugged road they took to further their education, be it academic pursuits at an institution or the school of hard knocks.
I don't want to jirble over the complaints of organized education by the spermologers here, because the dreadful curglaff of education is that we always have to be learning and can't be beef-witted about it. A shock-and-awe for me in these days and times is the resistentialism of higher education exhibited by unreasonable debt, which quickly applies slave shackles to all who attempt it (in the USA) despite employment prospects not far above a soda-squirt.
High school math is important in this regard. Today's minimum wage is $7.25/hour ($15k/year), but an inflation adjusted 1968 mininum wage of $1.60 would be $10.96/hour (or $22k/year) [and some argue that it would be $21.16/hr ($44k/year) if it had kept pace with overall income growth in the American economy, and if the US income distribution and US standards of decency remained.] What should really put the snoutfair of wage earners into a pussyvan is recognizing annual incomes LESS THAN $44k/year is less than 1968's equivalent decency standard of minimum wage. The outrage should bubble up the income ladder and piss more people off.
Joe-Six-Pack high school graduates act like California widows and display their own brand of snobbery against formal education that rings a bit like groaking. The issue with academics in our for-profit educational system is that they know which slide of the bread gets buttered and by whom in terms of research funding. It becomes very easy to leverage silence across the board, and to manipulate, smear, control, etc. those with the vaginas to speak up. 9/11 is no exception.
[S]ome highly educated individuals are terribly misinformed and in addition are stubborn about sticking to the misinformation they believe.~Adam Ruff (2013-09-03)
And many highly uneducated individuals are terribly misinformed and in addition are stubborn about sticking to the misinformation they believe (Amen, Brother!), just because someone with a PhD in a focused area "blinded them with science" [or a purposeful misconstrue] they didn't have the background to workthrough or peer-review on their own. They punt to the academic honors and lunt away blunts to the tyromancy studio, like queerplungers hoping academic smarts will be bestowed on them for their curglaff into deep areas.
Zafty Mr. Ruff (2013-09-03), when talking his misinformation about CO2, should first educate himself about greenhouse gases. Contrary to what news pundits and politicians tells him, the experts and academics are much more unified in their climate change views. Because he obviously hasn't studied it and has no research track record, he shouldn't expect to be picked for "peer review". Whether the sun is changing and whether human actions exasperate it, climate change is real.
Mr. Ruff (2013-09-03):
They are self appointed and therefore any pre existing bias that exists in the people selecting the panelists will manifest itself in their choices of who they select.
Take it upon yourself to self-appoint yourself as a peer reviewer, which is within your right as a 9/11 Truther. Maybe you'll be able to englishable works that were purposely meant to obfuscate by bookwrights, if you don't ignorantly "reject everything contained therein".
However, if my reading of Mr. Kevin Ryan reveals to be with squirrel, many other factors relating to genetics and which (private) school you attended go into making opportunities for the self-appointed.
Mr. Ruff can "stick with Joe six pack truther and his common sense approach to research and ... will stick with [his] gut feeling about who is legit and who isn't."
Me? I'll stick with just the truth even in small nuggets, because Joe-six-pack truthers also have a price and become wonder-wench California widows with just a few mortgage payments.
Another zafty queerplunger and wannabe bookwright groaked (2013-09-04) about leach fields leaking back tritium to the WTC (a total fabrication) and then attempts to jirble authority into the spermological tritium report that didn't have the twat to scientifically, systematically, and completely measure in a timely fashion all of the tritium. So whatever "infinitesimally tiny amounts of tritium" that the tritium report offers as englishable is incomplete and (using Mr. Ruff's criteria) ought to be rejected for its purposeful instances of deceit. Can't be trusted, so why does this snoutfair?
I don't know why the soda-squirt of a bookwright (2013-09-03) took offense for being compared to Luntz. Reliance on a faulty tritium report and relentless skewing it (as opposed to rejecting it) is a pretty good Luntz-ish example.
Another beef-witted Luntz-ish example (2013-09-03) from this spermologer is his obvious tyromancy into divining balderdash. The curglaff is two-fold: (1) when my response didn't appear, Mr. McKee was told off-list of my preference [and a different decision might have saved that lunter exposing his pussyvan]; (2) I stand behind and can substantiate my negative assessments that deploy the L-word, the C-word, and the W-word. Here's a good substantiating exhibit of such: 2013-09-04.
Words from a wonder-wench:
Why do people say "grow some balls"? Balls are weak and sensitive. If you wanna be tough, grow a vagina. Those things can take a pounding.~Betty White
Tyromancy told me that the "ruff" and "rogue" beef-witted snoutfairs have been tag-teaming for quite some time, ineffectually and not helped by their pussyvan.
//
x178
Señor El Once : planes flying
2013-09-04
Dear Mr. B. Record,
You were talking about Parsons. I was not (and wasn't really paying attention that you might have been or how critical it was to twisting your panties into a wad.)
I was talking about a plane that was flying (over) and the mistaken impression I got from you that no planes should have been flying, due to the orders to not let them take off. Different orders than pulling all flying planes from the sky, an order that didn't come until the Pentagon trick was pulled off.
I consider you to be a possible disinfo conduit due to your behavior toward this evidence and because your promotion of the Judy Woods nonsense.
Nonsense. I promote the nuggets of truth from Dr. Wood. I've stood on her shoulders and those of the Anomymous Physicists to suss out an alternative that more fully matches the evidence.
Based upon your comments and their reflection of little effort on your part to truly classify nuggets of truth from nuggets of nonsense in all disinformation vehicles (the only jalopies that 9/11 Truthers drive), I'd tell you to grow a pair were it not for these awesome words observed today:
Why do people say "grow some balls"? Balls are weak and sensitive. If you wanna be tough, grow a vagina. Those things can take a pounding.~Betty White
For what it's worth, I'm "a duped useful idiot", not "a disinfo conduit." I can be convinced of many things, with properly applied math, science, and analysis.
//
x179
Señor El Once : using character assassination methods
2013-09-05
2013-09-05 1:34 pm {email to Mr. Rogue}
Dear Mr. Rogue,
You quoted so well Jeremy Rys:
"If you see anyone attempting to "debunk" someone using character assassination methods, you should automatically see this as a direct signal that they have absolutely no valid argument whatsoever."
Now venture to your comments on your Prologue and simply scan them for your insults aimed (exclusively) at me. Make a note of their date stamps. I particularly like how your "character assassination methods" go back to November (just on Prologue) and then all the way up to just an hour and twelve minutes after the "damning" Jeremy Rys quote.
One need not look beyond the title of your "Carnival d'Maxifuckanus" to see what has "no valid argument whatsoever." But to be thorough, scan its comments for your insults, too.
You debunk yourself.
In my humble opinion, your reputation will be better served in unpublishing them both. Maybe you'll find something worthy of mining, editing, and re-purposing. As they presently stand, the pussyvan leaching out of your Prologue and Carnival postings is so thick, it quickly overshadows any point you might have wanted to make.
P.S. I did not publish your Mom's name or indicate a relation to you. [You did.] I did not publish her telephone number or address, or any information about you, such as your email address or IP address(es). Yet you've unethically published both my email address [Prologue April 19, 2013 at 6:03 pm -- although under my alias, the content came from you] and IP address [Carnival September 4, 2013 at 4:07 pm].
Please remove the first comment (if not both) and the IP address from the second. Otherwise, I will use them as further substantiating evidence of your cheating (and unethical) ways.
//
x180
Señor El Once : reputation-screwing articles
2013-09-05
2013-09-05 4:20 pm {email to Mr. Rogue}
Dear Mr. Rogue,
I should point out that "you" (via a posting to your reputation-screwing articles) technically "e-mailed" me first. Refer to the forwarded message below. Make no more postings to those blogs -- or unpublish those articles -- and I shall have no cause to respond by email or otherwise; your wish shall be granted.
Of course, you can also filter my email messages, which was advice given to you more than once in the past. Guess you weren't up to the intellectual challenge of figuring that out, just like you haven't figured out how to set your blog to be in the correct time zone (or how to make them private or how to format them properly.)
I am more than generous and fair with you. I even telegraph my plays, because it is no fun to win by a technicality and/or stupid moves on your part.
You yourself dig the grave for your reputation, and I merely point out the hole for others to see and not fall in.
Doesn't have to be this way, Mr. Rogue.
Stop digging. Stop cheating. Stop lying.
The skew you put on the tritium report is a perfect example. The report had a stilted purpose and skewed information (regarding trace levels), and was in no condition to be used by Dr. Jones without question or qualification as essentially the sole authority on what tritium was measured. [You have yet to acknowledge the validity of its glaring weaknesses.] Based on the purposeful deceit discovered therein, maybe Mr. Ruff's advice to "reject it all" is valid, because if it is skewing trace levels and even admits to stopping its sampling for tritium, maybe it shouldn't be trusted. However, rejecting the report does not equate with rejecting that tritium was measured or with implying "there was no tritium."
Yet this was exactly one of your latest cheats.
If I were being generous, maybe we could say that one side of the argument scale holding chemical explosives balances with the other side holding neu nookiedoo. But then you insist on punctuating your work with cheats [Carnival d'Maxifuckanus], like a snaking finger hooking one side of the scale to unfairly pull it down that is easily exposed for all customers to see.
Your online legacy, Mr. Rogue, will be hardly worth preserving, much less exploring. In a fair and generous way, this statement telegraphs why your short-sighted works fail. You write for you and for now, and you apply no temperance or filtering on your emotions. The winning strategy, however, is to write for an audience of the (distant) future, and to make your arguments objectively, fairly, and respectfully.
//
x181
Señor El Once : TALKING is done to himself
2013-09-06
2013-09-06 {email to Mr. Rogue}
I am not talking TO the Señor entity here. I am talking ABOUT the Señor entity. Thus this is not a CONVERSATION.
So the TALKING is done to himself but promoted to the world. And despite all the word-smithing and faulty rationalization, "talking ABOUT" someone else (1) in the derogatory, (2) with malframing, and (3) withholding rebuttal really puts a fine point on what
CHEATING is [aside from being grossly off-topic.]
Can't win on an even playing field, eh?
Carry on digging the grave for your reputation, Mr. Rogue, but I suggest you back-up your COTO work regularly from now on. You wouldn't want to have your
fine monologue with yourself get sent to the TRASH for a technicality by COTO admins who subscribe and could justify its demise for being seriously out of compliance with the rules of engagement on COTO regarding personal attacks.
Here's a hint: you can have your dashboard from COTO and from your blog open in different tabs at the same time. You can copy source HTML of your posting and/or comments from one blog to another.
Here's another hint: if TRUTH is your guide, you ought to take advantage of being able to edit your comments and cut deep in your purging of the ad hominem. Else, your COTO products come vastly short of your genius hype.
Thus, your CYA assignment for the weekend, lest COTO2 go the way of COTO1 in vanishing your efforts.
//
x182
hybridrogue1 : Falsely FALSE ADVERTISING
2013-09-08
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 10:44 pm hybridrogue1
Señor El Once — JUNE 6, 2012 – 6:00 PM T&S Judy Wood thread…
This is the whole sales pitch thing on THE BOOK. Insisting I must have THE BOOK!
"In your case given your tenure here, the dominance of your postings, and your anti-Wood stance, at the very least you should be making your arguments from the latest efforts of Dr. Wood. Her website ain't that, neither are the 3 years older Jenkins criticisms of her work (e.g., website.)"~Señor Maxitwat
FALSE ADVERTISING: There is NOTHING of substance that is new in this book that is not on that website! So there is nothing out of date as per Jenkins' criticisms either.
Maxitwat is already flipping nuclear boogers at this point as well. Whatta short order crook!
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 3:21 pm jerseyg
Ok, I have had enough of your bs. This is a warning HR. All derogatory & disrespectful remarks within your comments, whether directed against me, El Senor or anyone else that comments frequently on this blog will no longer be tolerated. Those posts will be immediately DELETED. I've already done so with one today where, once again, you verbally attacked me.
So if you want to continue to use this space as your private diary or whatever the hell you are doing here, I'd advise you to learn how to respect the opinions of others. If that is asking too much of you and you insist it's necessary to continue on with your defamatory comments and ad hominem attacks because that is who YOU are then you are no longer welcome to post here.
It's your choice. The rest of us have no problem abiding by the rules of common courtesy amongst fellow members.
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 8:24 pm hybridrogue1
Listen Debra,
I brought my comments here specifically to stay out of your face.
So stay out of my face!
If you interfere with this thread again then fuck off…I am sick of your fucking nanny shit. No one pulls this thread up anymore except for you and Maxitwat.
We are each moderators of our own threads here, that is the COTO system set-up — so don't fuck with me and I won't fuck with you. If you want to ban one of the core members after sucking up to this son-of-a-bitch infiltrator Maxitwat, then you have just hit the bottom of the shaft.
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-09 at 12:09 am hybridrogue1
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 8:12 pm hybridrogue1
The RJ Lee Group performed an extensive study of the Banker's Trust building at 130 Liberty Street to assess structural damage as well as dust contamination. The dust analysis this group performed is, as it is self-proclaimed in the reports, one of the most extensive dust studies performed costing 33 million dollars. Within one of the reports,vi they state:
"The WTC Dust and WTC Hazardous Substances contaminating the Buildings' mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are conductive, corrosive and abrasive. WTC Dust has permeated every component in the [Banker's Trust] Building. The WTC Dust has been shown to be corrosive to unprotected metal, to affect the conductivity of circuit boards in a manner that will cause intermittent failures, and to be severely abrasive when present in lubricants at only five percent of the volume."
"Dust which may be conductive can short electrical systems in vehicles which might spuriously ignite vehicle fires. Metallic particles, various carbonaceous molecules (constituents of soot, graphite, some office toners, etc.), moisture mixing with the many cations, anions, and salts, are all constituents of the dust which conduct. The electrical conduction of the dust will depend upon the thickness deposited. Thicker dust results in higher electrical conduction. This may explain why the Vesey/West Street parking lotand West Broadway/Park Place vehicles were not ignited by the initial dust cloud from the South tower, but required the subsequent added dust from the North tower collapse. Once the fires had stripped the paint from the vehicles, the heated steel from the fire caused rapid surface oxidation. Steel will rapidly oxidize on the surface when exposed to high temperatures, moisture, and a ready supply of oxygen.
The already oxidized and exposed metal corroded at an accelerated rate after the fires subsided and the corrosive ambient dust resettled upon the vehicles. Fine dust is easily agitated becoming airborne."~Study
Pg. 4 -5 Supplemental: Miscellaneous Topics -DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence By Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 2:39 pm jerseyg
Touche' Mr El Once… well done ! Yes indeed, having a closed mind means you live in darkness and the light never shines within ;)
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 11:17 pm hybridrogue1
You know JG,
I never imagined this would escalate to this point with you.
I was staying off the current threads waiting for this crap between us to blow over. But YOU had to come in here. Where you know damned well that no one attends except for myself and the badger Bridges.
You had to jump between us and defend him…when I have made it so crystal clear why I don't want his crap here. And then you act like I "attacked YOU"??? WTF?
I was clearly avoiding the new threads to avoid you. You sought me out here. If you don't think that is bloody obvious then I don't know what you are doing in a coalition of the obvious. Because this whole trip you are pulling is as plain as day.
And you know very well why I brought this forward on Boomers thread after your threats. Don't try to play games with me, and don't try to sucker the rest of COTO with this underhanded bullshit.
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-09 at 2:02 am hybridrogue1
Ah, so now…
Maxitwat won't give it a break for even a day. Now the entity is back to throwing up his chunks of 2000 word posts on Prologue at C1.
Where does the impetus newly derive" He has swayed one of the weakest minds on COTO, who happens to be a co-site-manager.
So he is playing is hard deep infiltration trick, right there on my home site. And this has been this motherfucker's end game the whole time.
He has done his best to get me axed at T&S, but Mr McKee is to smart to fall for his shit. So now he rushes in to get JG to put a knife in the back of one of COTOs core members.
How could anyone wonder that I consider this anonymous twat an vicious badger with evil intent"
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-09 at 9:54 am hybridrogue1
"Hey CR…good to see you. I agree. I don't hold grudges but I will defend myself when attacked."~jerseyg on September 8, 2013
at 7:38 pm – http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2013/09/07/coto-is-a-coalition-of-the-obvious/
This is absolute nonsense – JG is still pissed off about my comments about her being a silly jejune superstitious nitwit, for believing that the Ouija Board is driven by dark spirits and demons. She has been spitting fire at me since that time.
And the real history of her being "attacked" in this current round of bullshit is that she went out of her way to confront me in defense of this disingenuous saccharine gentile posing, of "Dearest Señor El Once" on a thread on C1 that is essentially defunct as far as attendance.
And now she and others want to frame me as a misogynist because she is a woman, forgetting that my main antagonist and complaint is son-of-a-bitch Señor Maxitwat, who claims to be a man.
And then to frame me as being unreasonable, for 'holding grudges' unnecessarily, when this stalking badger Maxitwat is on my ass every single day for weeks, months, years….WTF"
It was just last night that he spewed more of his filth on my thread that I made clear he was not welcome at. Just two days before he was sending me personal emails!! And this isn't stalking" What the fuck" Has the whole world gone insane"
Well I know one psycho stirring itself into this mix, and that is Maxitwat who is insanely jealous because of my continued standing at T&S – where noting he has done to assassinate my character has been effective. He used to consider himself as essentially, Craig's right hand man there. But it wasn't my doing that caused any changes to take place, it has been his continuing obsolescence due to insisting on bringing up his one-trick hobby-horse of "nuclear Dew"…no matter what the topic of the thread.
I told this stupid fuck this would be his downfall. His copying of my sign-off of: \\][//, with his, // might have been seen as the highest compliment of trying to be like me. But who wants a nutball to obsess like an abscess on your olfactory glands" Who needs such a stench in ones life"
\\][//
x183
Mr. M & hybridrogue1 : This is what he has to say about that
2013-09-08
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 8:44 pm hybridrogue1
By: hybridrogue1 on September 8, 2013 at 8:44 pm
Alright, I just found this on my thread, Prologue:
I have been posting there rather than bother Debra in the open and attended to threads here. But now she has to chase me down to the post that I can say with deep confidence that no one from COTO has been to for close to a year.
Here are her commands:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ok, I have had enough of your bs. This is a warning HR. All derogatory & disrespectful remarks within your comments, whether directed against me, El Senor or anyone else that comments frequently on this blog will no longer be tolerated. Those posts will be immediately DELETED. I've already done so with one today where, once again, you verbally attacked me.
So if you want to continue to use this space as your private diary or whatever the hell you are doing here, I'd advise you to learn how to respect the opinions of others. If that is asking too much of you and you insist it's necessary to continue on with your defamatory comments and ad hominem attacks because that is who YOU are then you are no longer welcome to post here.
It's your choice. The rest of us have no problem abiding by the rules of common courtesy amongst fellow members."~By: jerseyg on September 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm
http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/prologue-new-wave-911/#comment-46384
. . . . . . . . . .
The following is my reply:
Listen Debra,
I brought my comments here specifically to stay out of your face.
So stay out of my face!
If you interfere with this thread again then fuck off…I am sick of your fucking nanny shit. No one pulls this thread up anymore except for you and Maxitwat.
We are each moderators of our own threads here, that is the COTO system set-up — so don't fuck with me and I won't fuck with you. If you want to ban one of the core members after sucking up to this son-of-a-bitch infiltrator Maxitwat, then you have just hit the bottom of the shaft.
. . . . . . . . .
Now this has given Max "Senor Once" the courage to again flood my thread with his garbage as well.
So here is the bottom line; if the rest of you are with JG here on this power play, then fine; Ban me. I ask no quarter.
This might have been a temporary squawk between JG and I, if she would simply mind her own business. And this pulling rank, of saying she is a manager at COTO is bullshit as far as I'm concerned.
If she is going to act unilaterally on her own and 86 me, then there it is.
But I refuse to kneel down to this holier than though shit.
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 9:06 pm Mr. M
By: Mr. M on September 8, 2013 at 9:06 pm
This is what I have to say about that; these are all simply words. Words are indeed powerful and not without harm, but in the end no one bleeds, as long as they remain just words.
Say whatever you wish. My take is that everyone has as much right as anyone else to be as big an asshole as they want to be.
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 9:14 pm hybridrogue1
By: hybridrogue1 on September 8, 2013 at 9:14 pm
Well Mr M,
Who the asshole is, is a subjective call.
But as far as my right to be one, JG has different plans.
As you know, I never saw this game as a popularity contest. And I still don't give a fuck what anyone thinks of me.
But what I do object to is this pulling rank bullshit that JG is pulling.
And if she is going for the throat this time. Let's have it out here in the open.
Yea? Does that sound like a fair proposal?
\\][//
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 9:51 pm Mr. M
By: Mr. M on September 8, 2013 at 9:51 pm
I will withhold judgment as your challenge has not been meet.
As far as I'm concerned if anyone gets ostracized it will be of their own volition.
I do see this issue as something that is personal to the extent that it takes away from far more important issues, and I do hope we don't have to spend a lot of time on petty squabbles, perceived or otherwise, and we can get on with sticking it to the ones we need to be spending time on.
I hate to see talent wasted.
+++++ 2013-09-08 at 10:57 pm hybridrogue1
By: hybridrogue1 on September 8, 2013 at 10:57 pm
Again Mr M,
None of this would have come to your attention. I had made my comments to Boomer which were subtle enough. And that would have been it.
But JG needed to confront me on my own thread, that like I have said, it's never attended to but by myself, and the intruder now and again. She decided to get in between the intruder and myself and tell me I had to allow him to rummage through my place and leave his nasty scrawling on the walls.
So if you don't want anymore time spent on this, drop it yourself.
\\][//
No comments:
Post a Comment