Debunking NPT@WTC

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-Hole Warning! This entry publishes part 2 through part 4 as a continuation of Facebook (and email) discussions on the theme of NPT@WTC (no plane theory at the WTC on 9/11). As I wrote to Dr. James Henry Fetzer:

Debunking NPT at the WTC is not my 9/11 hobby-horse; FGNW is. I only do it as a favor to a fellow duped useful idiot who prides himself on being objective enough to let himself get duped another way with new informaion and/or properly applied science and logical analysis.

Censure on T&S

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-hole warning! Re-purposes discussions on Truth & Shadows that were of interest to me, even though I was in exile. Sometimes comments were authored by me even knowing that they might never be published until now.

Attempts at Rational 9/11 Discussion

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

---

x1 Maxwell C. Bridges : Behold examples of disinformation in action

2016-06-12

The following were attempts by me to have rational discussions about fourth generation nuclear devices on 9/11. Most of the parts in this article transpired on Facebook. By the very act of posting links to my blog article on FGNW, I attempted to move the discussion there. The following document many spins on the carousel.

Playing Disinfo Games

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

---

x2 Maxwell Bridges : Case study in a 9/11 disinformation operative

2016-06-13

My debate opponents in the discussion below unravel as disinformation operatives. Although they call themselves a committee, it is clearly a team of members with different roles and rules of engagement in maintaining their agenda

Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW

Hide All / Expand All

---

This article makes the case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Devices (FGND) were used on September 11, 2001 at the World Trade Center. In doing so, it discusses why the leading theory of Nano-Thermite proposed by many influential leaders in the 9/11 Truth Movement does not go the whole distance and is therefore wrong. This work demonstrates evolution in the beliefs of the author when presented with new information, although much of this article's content has been published previously.