Exotika 911 Blackhole #4

by Maxwell C. Bridges
2024-12-12

Spoiler: This article contains no sexual content... Except that if you read to its end, you may feel as if "blackhole #4" is a position for anal incest figuratively committed on your understanding of September 11, 2001 by entities whom you trusted and who should've known and responded better.

Hide All / Show

Introduction

As the quarter century anniversary to 9/11 approaches, the relevance of 9/11 to today deserves to be questioned. Why should anyone tune any further mental wavelengths into considering the 9/11 events? The short answer is that even the understanding of the 9/11 Truth community was "restricted into a narrow range of acceptable debate." ¹⁰¹ In this context, "blackhole" refers to a topic that evades legitimate analysis and discussion, even though Truth demands it.

The justification for your consideration of the premises in this work:

• It presents something new under the sun into the realm of 9/11 understanding.
• It exposes the key to much of the coordinated 9/11 disinformation; their fervor even with their lameness and incompleteness.
• It nuclear-energizes all other aspects of 9/11 Truth activism, narrowing down the list of suspects with the means and abilities.

This work aspires to be a scholarly effort into an "under-served" area of 9/11 research: the original World Trade Center Number Four (WTC-4), also known as the Southeast Plaza Building, that was seemingly destroyed by an approximately 30-story lattice of falling wall assemblies from one side of the WTC-2 tower.

WTC-4 is blackhole #4. The blackhole treatment was exhibited in how little analysis it generated by government agencies and 9/11 Truth groups who were charged with contemplating physics-compliant and reasonable explanations for the observed outcomes.

FGNW Discussions Vol. 5

Maxwell C. Bridges

2024-12-11

This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions from 2023-09 through 2024-12.

9/11 Exotic Nuclear Weapons (Version 3)

Hide All / Expand All

---

by Maxwell C. Bridges
2024-04-11

Hide All / Show

This is version 3 -- scaled-down to 2k-words -- of "9/11 Exotic Nuclear Weapons" submitted to the International Center for 9/11 Justice on 2024-08-25.

The destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001 was accomplished using "exotic," fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW). They were hybrid-fission/fusion and released 80% of their tactical nuclear yield as highly-energetic neutrons in a conic, targeted fashion, thus permitting multiple tandem devices.

9/11 FGNW Exotic Nuclear Weapons

by Maxwell C. Bridges
2023-11-11

Fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW) were used in the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. The evidence for nuclear components leaks out of the entire 9/11 record. The overkill energy of the observed sudden complete decimation of the towers is a clue, purposely missed.

[Decimation] The towers were decimated through their paths of greatest resistance at near free-fall acceleration while also violently ejecting heavy content laterally. These are huge energy sinks.

But according to the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) promoted by government spokespersons and corporate media:

"NO EXTRA ENERGY WAS ADDED!!! The potential energy of the upper block, acting under the forces of gravity alone after structural steel was allegedly weakened by fires fueled by jet fuel and office furnishings, was sufficient to cause the towers to turn dust."

---

FGNW Discussions Vol. 2

This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions happened on Facebook between 2020-02 and 2020-08.

FGNW Discussions Vol. 3

This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions happened on Facebook between 2021-08 and 2022-11.

FGNW Discussions Vol. 4

This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions from 2023-07 through 2023-10.

NPT@WTC Discussions Vol. 3

by Maxwell C. Bridges
2023-10-01

This article spins a few times on the carousel called "no plane theory at the World Trace Center" (NPT@WTC), that I first took serious with September Clues.

Raw Nuclear DEW Research

Raw Nuclear DEW Research

Maxwell C. Bridges
2015-07-11

Expand All Part / Hide All Part

Expand All Sections / Hide All Sections

During a period of unemployment in 2015, I obtained a library card to my institution of higher education. This gave me access to not only their public bookstacks, but also to online repositories of information to which the library subscribed.

The goal of the research was to learn the approximate state of DEW and nuclear technology at the turn of the century (2000) from the public record. Literature searches were limited by date and topic. Much could be learned of the revelance of material from its abstract, which is generally easily accessible from repository search results and doesn't require going behind pay-walls (via a personally paid subsciption).

Online make it easy to simply create a list of everything coming from the search results. If interesting, copy what is relevant from its abstract. Deep-dive into the publication if the scent-of-the-information from the abstract deemed it worthy, and put those citations also into the list.

FGNW Discussions Vol. 1

The following discussions happened over a two year period primarily on Facebook, but also in other discussion forums and by e-mail. They were attempts by me to have rational discussions about 9/11 fourth generation nuclear devices, and tangentially about nano-thermite and about the "No Planes Theory" (NPT).

In most cases, my discussion partners resembled what a conspiracy theorist would expect as boots-to-the-ground infiltration of on-line forums, and controlling the message. Some are classic disinformation, defended poorly, unwilling to acknowledge weaknesses in premise, exhibiting in cases bot-tells in the engagement.

These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown.

NPT and Internet Bots

---

Debunking NPT (No Planes Theory) isn't my hobby-horse. I do it more as a community service. I had been duped 2009-2012 by NPT as provided by September Clues and its crafty Parts 1 thru 9 and A thru H. But I was open-minded and objective with regards to further analysis and research, such that I acknowledged when pillars of my NPT beliefs were destroyed and I had to recant and apologize.

"Doing unto others, as I would have them do to me...". I did not relish having my "open-minded and objective" nature (e.g., super powers of being naive and trusting, until given reason not to) be taken advantage of. I want to spare my fellow yeomen in the 9/11 Truth Movement similar embarrassment for having been duped. So I've had more spins than necessary trying to set the record straight.

"And I would have succeeded to, were it not for those pesky [agents & bots]". This work contains NPT rounds 5 through 7. For completeness, the following has links to previous NPT rounds.

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

This article makes the prima facie case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11. "A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party."

Note: A 2016 version "Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW " has been circulated on various websites and Facebook groups catering toward 9/11 discussions. Neither those championing the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) nor those in various camps of 9/11 truth (e.g., nano-thermite, DEW) have disproved or rebutted FGNW. Many exhibit tactics & traits of a disinformationalist. Common features across many forums were mockery, game playing, and avoidance of objectively discussing any of the specifics presented in the establishment of the FGNW presumption, followed by eventual banishment from the forum.

Prelude to Nookiedoo

Hide All / Expand All

Over-acting tag-teaming on Truth & Shadows. Here are special messages for Mr. Rogue, "compelled to tell lies to bolster your arguments", and Mr. Huff, "sick of SEO claiming we have not done so." They both fancy debate tricks to bolster impressions in their favor.

Forewarned is forearmed. Nookiedoo, my hobby-horse, is ready to take them for a ride, even though the gate to T&S pastures is closed for the Spring grass to grow.

Your WWF highlights: Mr. A.Wright was mentioned by Mr. Ruff, appears, and is taken on by Mr. Rogue who's mighty enough to handle Mr. Owen Meister at the same time.

NPT Carousel on FB "All Theories Welcome"

Hide All / Expand All

---

---

x165 Maxwell C. Bridges : won't be buried so easily

2014-03-11

The nuclear theory won't be buried so easily, because so much of the evidence -- even that collected by Dr. Wood -- points in that direction.

What will be buried are preconceived notions and deliberate mal-framing (e.g., Dimitri K.) of nuclear devices.

Early-Adopter Fourth Generation Nukes on 9/11

Hide All / Expand All

---

Part 1: 9/11 Debates

The following comments were made under:

9/11 Truth Movement: All Theories Welcome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1408668326044814/permalink/1415066332071680/


9/11 Truth Movement: Neutron Nuclear DEW
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1408668326044814/permalink/1415066332071680/

Neutron Nuclear DEW at Facebook 9/11 Debates

Hide All / Expand All

---

Part 2: Neutron Nuclear DEW at Facebook 9/11 Debates

The following comments were made under:

DEBATE ISSUES https://www.facebook.com/notes/911-debates/debate-issues/621888681188274


9/11 Debates: Neutron Nuclear DEW https://www.facebook.com/groups/602197473157395/permalink/662698580440617/

---

x40 Maxwell C. Bridges : premise: 9/11 was a nuclear event

2014-01-26

{This is a condensed re-posting on Facebook of another article. Fodder for skipping. It gets a total of three postings. This one, a re-start of this one, and then in another forum.}

Facebook: Minor 9/11 Debates

Hide All / Expand All

---

Part 1: 9/11 Debates

The following comments were made under:

DEBATE ISSUES https://www.facebook.com/notes/911-debates/debate-issues/621888681188274


9/11 Debates: Neutron Nuclear DEW https://www.facebook.com/groups/602197473157395/permalink/662698580440617/

---

x4 Maxwell C. Bridges : it was a controlled demolition. However...

2014-01-10

Agreed: 9/11 was an inside job. It was a controlled demolition. However...

Nuclear 9/11/2001 (for VT)

Hide All / Expand All

---

1. Introduction

Nuclear weapons were used on 9/11. The principle documents used to support the erroneous belief about 9/11/2001 ~not~ being nuclear are:

- "Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center" by T.M. Semkow, R.S. Hafner, P.P Parekh, G.J. Wozniak, D.K. Haines, L. Husain, R.L. Rabun, P.G. Williams.

- "Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers" by Dr. Steven Jones.

- The Paul Lioy et al Report on the characterization of the Dust/Smoke seems to deliver the no radiation premise.

- Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials

- Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction by Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe.

- "Supplemental: Miscellaneous Topics -DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence" by Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins

- "Where Did The Towers Go?" and website by Dr. Judy Wood.

Executive Summary: a re-configuration of the neutron bomb (or ERW: enhanced radiation weapon) was deployed on September 11, 2001. Such neutron devices (a) are a variant of fusion, (b) expel the lion's share of its nuclear yield as energetic neutrons, (c) can direct those neutrons and subsequently some of the blast and heat wave, and (d) may ~not~ leave significant levels of long-lasting, lingering alpha, beta, or gamma radiation. If not measured promptly (<72 hours), such radiation from the neutron devices dissipates quickly. The phrase is coined "neutron nuclear DEW" (directed energy weapon) to describe it. More than several were deployed per WTC tower.

This article will prove the nuclear 9/11 premise by reaching into the maw of disinformation sources and preserving the nuggets of truth that made convincing the disinfo case. That such nugget-mining efforts haven't already been exerted is testament to the infiltration depths of disinformation efforts. The nuclear argument is cummulative and not completely destroyed should individual nuggets be proven inapplicable or wrong. More importantly, when not proven otherwise, nuggets of truth remain and must be addressed in any theory-du-jour in order to be complete.

Nuclear 2001-09-11

This piece was written by Maxwell C. Bridges for Truth & Shadows. It addresses the issue of what destructive force could have been employed to bring down the World Trade Center towers. The predominant belief within the 9/11 Truth movement appears to be that nuclear devices were ~not~ used, and that conventional chemical based explosives and incendiaries, including some form of thermite, were the primary destructive mechanisms. But here, Mr. Bridges looks at the reports that substantiates those beliefs, finds them untrustworthy, and points out the deliberate disinformation that has steered our understanding. He documents some of the key aspects of the destruction that can't be explained (e.g., duration of under-rubble hot-spots, tritium measurements, vehicle damage, etc.) without the involvement of some other force. Mr. Bridges is a frequent contributor to this blog under the alias "Señor El Once." ~Craig McKee

Instructions: Because some sections are long and induce lots of scrolling, all section titles are hyperlinked to show or hide their content. The controls below show or hide the content of all sections.

Show All / Hide All

While this article provides a rational sequencing of the sections for the nuclear argument being made, it can also serve as a reference piece where sections are read out-of-sequence. For this reason, some seeming repetition does occur to give context to readers who skim, skip, and hop.

1. Introduction

Mark Twain once wrote:

It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled.

This is one of many reasons that make discussing the details of September 11, 2001 so difficult: we've all been fooled by some aspect of it. To top this off, purposeful, crafty disinformation was created, was promoted by mainstream media, and was injected into the 9/11 Truth Movement (9/11TM) to dupe even the best of us idiots.

Apologies in advance: this article itself might be serving up its own share of misinformation, so readers are encouraged to prudentially consume this with a healthy dose of distrust. Verify it, nugget by nugget. And because I don't relish being the sole duped useful idiot on the subject, please correct me where I've been misinformed.

Nuclear weapons were used on 9/11

This article proves the nuclear 9/11 premise by reaching into the maw of disinformation sources and preserving the nuggets of truth. That such nugget-mining efforts haven't already been exerted is testament to the infiltration depths of disinformation efforts. The nuclear argument is cummulative and not completely destroyed should individual nuggets be proven inapplicable or wrong. More importantly, when not proven otherwise, nuggets of truth remain and must be addressed in any theory-du-jour.

Executive Summary

A re-configuration of the neutron bomb ( or ERW: enhanced radiation weapon) was deployed on September 11, 2001. Such neutron devices (a) are a variant of fusion, (b) expel the lion's share of its nuclear yield as energetic neutrons, (c) can direct those neutrons and subsequently some of the blast and heat wave, and (d) may ~not~ leave significant levels of long-lasting, lingering alpha, beta, or gamma radiation. If not measured promptly (<72 hours), such radiation from the neutron devices dissipates quickly. The phrase is coined "neutron nuclear DEW" (directed energy weapon) to describe it. More than several were deployed per WTC tower.

The Dirt On That

Hide All / Expand All

---

x192 Señor El Once : The dirt on that

2013-09-13

2013-09-13
2013-09-13

Mr. Adam Ruff wrote [2013-09-12]:

I now place [Barbara Honegger] in the same category as Morgan Reynolds with his Hollogram theories and Judy Wood with her bogus DEW theories. I have no further use for miss Honegger and do not consider her to be a real truther.

I admit to not having studied Barbara Honegger's videos or Mr. OSS's analysis in detail [due to other things in my life requiring focus], so such an assessment may be valid. However, this does not alleviate anyone of the task of preserving the nuggets of truth from those works that merit such.