NPR started a 9/11 Discussion

Hide All / Expand All

NPR started a Disqus discussion.

---

Señor El Once : Stacked Deck

2011-08-26

on Conspiracy Theories And The Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks

The deck was stack from the get-go given the interviewee list: one 9/11 Truther against two 9/11 coincidence theorists, one biased moderator, and a heavily biased producer/editor who gave the final spin on the interview with regards to the minutes broadcast from each side (and how many minutes from each landed on the cutting room floor).

---

Señor El Once : Newtonian physics taught in high school

2011-08-26

on Conspiracy Theories And The Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks

On the surface of it, Ms. Dibble, you don't understand the Newtonian physics taught in high school to be able to talk knowledgeably about 9/11.

The acceleration of the towers demolition (near free-fall), the pulverization of content, and the ejection of mass laterally at great speeds are energy sinks that cannot be accounted for by a Newtonian gravitational collapse, as the govt misleads us into thinking. In fact, as soon as you have destruction of content or ejection of content (let alone both), then energy has been consumed that can no longer be used to keep the upper mass accelerating at near free-fall to the ground.

According to NIST's own Shyan Sunder, free-fall means that no structural resistance is present below a falling mass to slow a mass from gravitational acceleration, 9 m/(s^2). This is precisely what WTC-7 blatantly exhibits over 100 feet. The acceleration of towers' collapse through the path of greatest resistance to the ground was measured in times pretty damn close to free-fall.

So how did these three structures collapse at near free-fall through their paths of greatest resistance while also pulverizing content and ejecting content (in the case of the towers)?

The answer is easy. Energy was added to the demolition so that gravity didn't have to account for it all.

Energy added means 19 hijackers in planes (whose whereabouts prior to 9/11 was known and didn't include extensive stays in NYC in order to configure demolition) didn't do it. They had help. INSIDER HELP, not just to the secure buildings but also to appropriate mechanisms of destruction.

This is the can of worms 9/11 opens, and that everyone from govt officials through complicit corporate media (and even this NPR report) are trying desperately these last 10 years to distract us from. Some were involved; most became involved in the cover-up after the fact, because they know that public revelation to these facts could, would, and should radically overthrow the status quo on so many levels -- certainly a purging of govt and its agencies, if not a re-drawing of region/nation lines within the USA.

Of course, a "radical overthrow of the status quo" doesn't have to mean violent. It could be very peaceful: "Hey, federal govt! You are no longer representing us and doing things for us in manners we find acceptable. You are no longer needed. Our region has its own laws. Federal govt get out, and expect no more money from us to fight your wars or pay the central bank."

Chandler Started but Didn't Finish

The following are one-side of three online exchanges with David Chandler. The links on the date stamp go to the source.

Expand All /
Hide All

Señor El Once : the paper you co-authored with Frank Legge

2011-09-19

Dear Mr. Chandler,


I studied the paper you co-authored with Frank Legge.


The core piece of information — the flight data recorder from the Pentagon plane — has authentication issues and chain-of-custody issues right and left. The kicker for me was the original FDR information was missing the final four seconds. Along comes a mysterious “John Farmer” who found a way to re-build/extract the flight path of those final four seconds. Lo and behold, the path went smoothly into the Pentagon, despite being in disagreement with the readings from other aircraft instruments that said the plane was never that low.


Why were those final four seconds missing from the FDR?

Why weren't they originally decoded, because they represent the money-shot time period?

Seems to me if the FDR really did have such a smooth flight-path into the Pentagon, it would have been made public sooner.


Back to the disagreement of the final four seconds with the readings from other aircraft instruments that said the plane was never that low. Those readings are explained away in your paper as being in error, owing to the aircraft speed, without analysis of why they would be in error and the direction that error would take. In other words, does a pressure-based altimeter give off measurements that are higher or lower than actual altitude when speed is increased?

The pressure based altimeter at high speed and high altitude is known to introduce errors. My meager research on the subject does not show indications of errors at low altitude at high speed or how the error would be manifested.


Thus, Mr. Chandler, in case you didn't recognize it, the above is a lynch-pin in your whole paper's premise, and it is one that you haven't proven.

Vatic 9/11 Special [2011]

The Vatic 9/11/2011 Special  is intended to serve as a 9/11 Reference.

Things have changed since last year. Dr. Judy Wood came out with her new book, "Where did the Towers Go?", an excellent addition to any serious 9/11 researcher's library. By golly if that book didn't get me into the directed energy weapon camp.

In 2010, the Vatic Project said:

The 9/11 Special does not shirk from saying that 9/11 was a nuclear event, that corporate media fooled the world with computer generated images (CGI), and that US Government/Military Insiders, Mossad/Israel, and zionists within the banks and media are the culprits.

In 2011, the Vatic Project amends that with "9/11 used cold-fusion or nuclear reactors to generate the power for DEW that supplied the accuracy and umpth to pulverize the internals of the towers".

As before, these rabbit holes of 9/11 DEW (powered by nukes or cold-fusion), CGI, and "whodunnit" are very deep and twisted. But if you only have time for limited 9/11 review, put these on your must explore list:

» September Clues 2008 Complete,
» Directed Energy Weapons,
» Nuclear destruction of the WTC (even though we now champion DEW), and
» Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!

For your own peace of mind, satisfy for yourself whether or not they have merit. At risk is our entire system of justice.

Why should you care about this ten year old event today? Aside from the lingering effects of radiation in NYC affecting first responders and residents, you should care that the true 9/11 perpetrators are brought to justice, because left unchecked gives them and their successors free reign (again and again) to manipulate us and the world into other wrongful wars and crimes against humanity. Nations fall if justice is not pursued. Only we can save it.

Among the most basic of your take-away action items from this Vatic 9/11 Special, is that you need to be part of the voice to demand an independent investigation of 9/11. After that, you need to be questioning and denouncing all foreign & domestic policy and the right-left political games that are based on the lies of 9/11 ("... because we were attacked on 9/11(?)...") and that seem to scapegoat another [country, ethnicity, religion].

Here are some quick links to help you navigate the 9/11 Special.Do a right-click from your browser and open them in new tabs.

• 9/11 How
• 9/11 Why
• 9/11 Who
• 9/11 What

Informed Speculation

The following is an exchange with a 9/11 Truther who supports nuking of the towers.

Expand All /
Hide All

---

Bruecke : Informed Speculation

July 27, 2011

Dear Dr. Ward, I know nothing about 9/11 definitely, so take this more as "informed speculation." I read Dr. Wood's textbook and discovered that her case for directed energy weapons is better than the case I had been championing for milli-nukes. However, even DEW needs an energy source: cold-fusion, fusion-triggered fission, Tesla-hurricanes...? The remnants from the DEW energy source could give off the same clues as milli-nukes, while avoiding some issues like seismic signatures, uncontrollable blast wave, heat wave, etc. The copious amounts of unburnt paper is a clue to me that milli-nukes might not have been used on the towers. I wouldn't go so far as to say WTC-7 was demolished using conventional techniques. On this matter we can probably rely on Dr. Shyam Sunder who confidently debunked conventional explosives because it lacked the appropriate audio/decibel signature. Weak? For sure, but Dr. Sunder would not have used it if he didn't know that the true cause was something else. As for WTC-6 and its big bad-ass crater? Could have been a milli-nuke, which might explain the anomalous side-effects that affected vehicles on that street perpendicular to it and next to the WTC-7. But I'm also leaving the door open for space-based DEW to have made the crater as well as the cylindrical bore-holes in WTC-5 and cut the WTC-4 main edifice down at a line with the WTC-4 North wing. A few devices within the towers probably brought them down. Remember the "spire" that stood for a few seconds after the tower around it was pulverized or peeled off? Would have been ideal to plant a DEW device pointing up and other pointing down and timed appropriately. DEW microwaved the water molecules trapped in content, turned it into steam, which then expanded its volume to tear apart the content (e.g., drywall, concrete, humans). Explains the copious amounts of pulverized dust exhibited in the destruction from the earliest phases; why paper wasn't affected; why the interior side of the exterior walls were so "clean" of drywall and paint; ... The evidence presented in Dr. Wood's textbook needs to be addressed by whatever is the theory of the day. According to her, seismic evidence debunks nukes. My understanding morphs and waffles.

Duped? Useful? Aye!

Okay, okay. I am partially to blame for the next sequence of events. I repeat often in my work that "all disinformation needs to have a solid foundation of truth in order to be successful." Being banned from LRF cut off my subscriptions and made it very tedious to check up on any solid foundation of truth within the gatekeeping at their forum.

At the conclusion of my first banishment and in a fit of annoyance, I wrote in an email to Mr. Jayhan:

Have no fears that I will sockpuppet back into existence on LRF under a new alias. Our exchanges here are rapidly diminishing whatever value I once attributed to LRF as well as any perceived gained from registering just so I could subscribe to threads as a lurker reader.

I was wrong. Registering just so I could subscribe to threads as a lurker reader does make it easier to monitor its ongoing foundation of truth. I apologize to Mr. Jayhan for going back on my word. I came back as DupedUsefulI to be assured I wasn't discounting any truths that might be seeping out. [These seemingly unworthy actions would not have been needed had Mr. Jayhan not exhibited equally unworthy actions of going back on his word by banishing Herr der Elf without any subsequent infringements against said warnings or decrees.]

Over time I managed to get subscribed to 60 threads on a weekly basis, so that items wouldn't pass me by, nor would updates overwhelm and distract me. A couple of images were posted that merited another look from the perspective of DEW.

But then Mr. Jayhan re-posted a chat with Simon Shack of September Clues (that really was unflattering to Mr. Jayhan, but he couldn't see it from his ad hominem.) In addition, Dr. FUBAR provided a link to a Jayhan debate with a principle from CIT in 2008, where Mr. Jayhan deliberately recycled an insult from half a year earlier that had been smoothed over and resolved in order to take fresh offense therein. Two data points that combine with Mr. Jayhan's public childish flame wars with William Rodriquez and then my banishment. The trend line tracks a gatekeeping agenda.

Simon Shack said it best:

You are losing ground, mate - and you know it. Too many good guys have joined your forum - and you don't know how to get rid of them. ... You are all-too-transparently linked to the Great 9/11 Gatekeeping Community. Your childish attitude is a clear give-away of this fact. ... Why don't you just get another job?

And this is why DupedUsefulI could not be permitted however infrequently to keep poking away at directed energy weapons (DEW). I couldn't be lured by:

If you feel like making a smart ass comment and getting the last word in on this, your membership here will be terminated.

Too bad Mr. Jayhan could not see fit to keep the management of subscriptions alive while banning future posts from me. So little does he value the truth contained within the webside he administers.

Non-Sequitor

Bruecke Note: Yes, this is a humorous newspaper comic. What sort of predictive elements, however, are buried within for ridicule? It starts around July 4, 2011. It is worth reading to the end.

http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2011/07/04

By: Wiley Miller
Date: 2011-07-04

Swiss Bank Note Shows Elenin/Nibiru?

On purpose, speculation on Elenin/Nibiru runs from one extreme to another. Because Earth will pass through the tail of Elenin that is composed of matter, some venture that the "ELE" in "Elenin" stands for "Extinction Level Event" like what took out the dinosaurs. Earth could face massive meteor showers.

On a more benign level, most spokespeople for the govt downplay this celestial event as a non-event. What is kind of unbelievable in a competence sort of a way is the story that NASA and other govt agencies were surprised by the discovery of this comet [by a Russian (?) amateur astronomer supposedly named "Elenin" to diffuse "nine-eleven backwards" comparisons and ELE]. What? They didn't know? They weren't monitoring it?

An internet friend of mine is writing a book about "predictive programming" and how much of modern events, such as the destruction of the WTC towers on 9/11, was foreshadowed, predicted, and even to a degree planned by Hollywood (and entertainment) productions, possibly as a way to seed our beliefs and our reactions.

With this in mind, take a look at these predictions printed on the face of Swiss bank notes. Has our solar system mapped out as well as the path of another element.

From an internet posting on this subject: The symbols are fairly common in astrology, with the exception of the Earth symbol, although I've been told that this symbol is used for Earth in Switzerland, which is fair enough I guess.

Yep, count the rings of our solar system. Note the orange elliptical orbit and what is almost a fat exclamation point (!), which is really a depiction of the comets tail.

 

It isn't for me to predict what that event will be. I've read where it will not be ELE, but it could certainly be life-changing and revealing, the true nature of humans on this planet and in the universe, both physical and spiritual. And if bad things come, it'll be of the Karl Rove/Rahm Emanuel nature taking advantage of the opportunity of a good crisis, which we need to be wary of being a false flag.

Predictive Programming: Children's Program and the Alien Agenda

I know of people who are researching predictive programming. Basically, many real-world events were foreshadowed by Hollywood. In particular, many aspects of 9/11. And if the events themselves weren't scripted first in Hollywood, then publishing and repetition in advance had the effect of conditioning us.

A great example is that overboard patriotic action adventure yarn, Pearl Harbor. It came out in May 2001, with ample time for us to get all our patriotic priorities in order, and what we (or young people) should do when we are told that we are attacked by external enemies.

Be that as it may, I've noticed a trend in children's programming to help young kids get over their fear of dragons and dinosaurs, who in many ways have characteristics of the reputed "reptile aliens" supposedly living in deep underground bases/cities on our planet.

Dragon Tales (PBS)
Dinosaur Train (PBS)
Barney (PBS)
How to train your dragon (Pixar Disney?)
Land Before Time (not sure who put this up originally, but whole seasons can be purchased on DVD)
Monsters versus Aliens (Pixar Disney?)
Monster, Inc. (Pixar Disney?)

Scooby-Doo And The Alien Invaders is a good case study. The Wikipedia link explains the plot well, like at the end: "At the end of the film, Crystal and Amber prove to be aliens from 20 light years away, and are dressed like they are because their interpretations of the way humans are dressed were derived from 1960s television broadcasts, to which Shaggy says, "Hey, why mess with a classic look." The UFO that ran Shaggy off the road was actually Crystal's."

Crystal and Amber were shape-shifting aliens, almost dragon or sphinx-like who break Shaggy's and Scooby's hearts.

There's more, but the point is that children's programming has ample fodder for consideration, and an agenda to get children (who grow into adults) to be not scared of intelligent and speaking reptiles, some of whom can fly.

On the Directed Energy Weapon Hypothesis: an open letter to Gage and Cole

By Maxwell C. Bridges
Published on Truth & Shadows

The recent article "AE911Truth FAQ #6: What’s Your Assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis?" by misters Cole & Gage concluded with:

“We do not support the DEW hypothesis because it is not supported by the available evidence. In contrast, the explosives/incendiaries hypothesis for the WTC destruction is well supported by the evidence.”

Really? Does the evidence actually support well the explosives/incendiaries hypothesis, and in particular nano-thermite, which was found in the dust at the WTC?

In dispute here is not the discovery of nano-thermite in the dust or its deployment as one of the mechanisms of the WTC destruction. As a secondary or redundant mechanism, it does not have to address all of the features of destruction. The issue is that nano-thermite has been extracted (wrongly) by the scientifically weaker yeomen of the 9/11 Truth movement to explain all (or most) of the observed destruction features.

Case in point – nano-thermite reaches extremely high temperatures quickly, but:

Stars align in 2011 for your 9/11 activism

{With tongue somewhat in cheek.}

If individuals were in need of an occult or astrological sign for finally doing some of their own 9/11 activism this year (2011), consider this.

Not only does this year have the date 9/11/11 (10-year) anniversary, but it is filled with other significant dates like: 1/1/11, 1/11/11, 11/1/11, and 11/11/11. Lots of strings of 1's in those dates. Plus dates like 2/11/11, 3/11/11, 4/11/11, 5/11/11, 6/11/11, 7/11/11, 8/11/11, 10/11/11, and 12/11/11 also have more groupings of 1's to get you thinking about the significance of eleven's and one's in this particular year.

More importantly and why it matters to you personally like stars aligning, do the simple math. Take the two-digit year of your birth and add the age you will be this year. You will get either 111 or 11, whereby both are more strings of coincidental 1's but with the latter being shorted by a 100, because they were the unfortunate who were born in this century and will be paying for 9/11/01 still, one way or another, when they reach adulthood.


Elenin Data From NASA

Sep 11, 2011 Elenin 0.482 AU from Sun (closest point)
Sep 27, 2011 Elenin 0.396 AU from Earth, 0.607 AU from Sun; Elenin between Sun & Earth
Oct 17 2011 Elenin 0.232 AU from Earth (closest point)
Nov 5, 2011 Elenin 0.348 AU from Earth but Earth crosses Elenin tail
Nov 11, 1011 Elenin 0.42 AU from Earth and Earth finishing crossing tail

1 Earth radius is about 7,920 miles.
1 AU is 93 million miles.
0.15 AU is close to 14 million miles.
14 million miles is almost 1,768 Earth radii.
15 Earth radii is 118,800 miles. That's about half way to the Moon.

If the comet gets 14 million miles from Earth, that would be almost 59 times the distance to the moon.

On Sep 27 Elenin will transit between the Sun and the Earth and its ion tail will be pointed straight at us. It will also be new Moon, meaning the Sun, Elenin, Moon, and Earth will be aligned (with Uranus behind Earth and Mercury and Venus out of the way on the other side of the Sun. If any of you believe in cosmic thunderbolts, this might be an interesting time. Strong electromagnetic disturbance is possible, as is damage to electronics and power grids.

The light of the Sun might be scattered by the coma and the dust tail of the comet, making the Sun look diffused and the sky darker. It is possible in these conditions that the new Moon could be visible, as a black Moon.

Then around closest approach Oct 17, Earth should begin to go through the dust tail, creating significant meteor showers (and remember, all the lights might have fried on Sep 27). The meteor shower would peak around Nov 3, when Earth crosses the path of Elenin. 

Proof That Comet Elenin Is Affecting Earth

{Excerpts from Dr. Mark Sircus.}

The conclusion: a planetary event was in store for us in 2012.

Looking at a NASA mathematical model of comet Elenin, I found out that a large celestial body has already penetrated the solar system and is on course for a near and possibly horrific encounter with the earth in the fall of 2011. What we do not know is the size and mass of comet Elenin though I have no doubt that it is known by the authorities.

Elenin is presently being tracked as it goes through the asteroid belt on its way into the inner solar system. ... We have an incoming mass (what might possibly be a neutron star) coming in and it will do a hard turn around the sun like any comet would, crossing and coming in between Mercury and Venus before starting its journey back out. On its way out it will cross our bow, meaning it will pass very close to the earth and the earth will pass behind it, plowing into its tail.

In the video below you will see this explained graphically. What you will see with mathematical precision is that every time this celestial body comes into alignment with the earth and sun we have a huge earthquake. The last three alignments produced the Japanese 9.0 quake, the one in New Zealand and before that the one in Chile. On March 11th Elenin was much farther out. When the next alignment happens it will be devastatingly close. The main point to understand is that if Elenin was just a normal comet it would not have the mass to generate a gravity pull that would affect the earth when the earth swings around into alignment.