The 9/11 Time Discrepancy Oddity: Distress Signals Indicated Planes Crashed Minutes BEFORE Flights 11 and 175 Hit the WTC
by Shoestring on Wed, 09/08/2010
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-08/911-time-discrepancy-oddity-distress-signals-indicated-planes-crashed-minutes-flights-11-and-175-hit-wtc
Radio transmitters that are carried aboard aircraft and that are supposed to activate only in the event of the aircraft crashing went off in the New York area several minutes before the two planes hit the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. In events that, according to the official account of 9/11, should have been impossible, emergency locator transmitters (ELTs), which are intended to help locate crashed aircraft by broadcasting a distinctive signal, were activated over two minutes before American Airlines Flight 11 hit the north WTC tower and over four minutes before United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower. And yet no ELTs went off at the times these planes hit the towers, when we might have expected them to have been activated.
2010-09-11
9/11 WTC Detonations Finally Revealed.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
WTC-7 Before Its Demolition
Bridge Note: Look at this video of the area surrounding WTC-7 before its collapse. The fires on specific floors and only those floors suggests something else was the cause other than the demolition of the neighboring towers. At minute 4:53, we see street scenes where "car after car after are burned down to their metal." Although there is debris from destruction all around, I content that ther busted windows and burned out nature were results of nuclear blasts and EMP.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CO-zGbEasTA&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CO-zGbEasTA&feature=player_embedded
Mainstream Media Boycott for 9/11 Justice
September 8, 2010
Source: 9/11 Truth News
An activist group is calling for a complete boycott of corporate mainstream media, starting on the 9th anniversary of 9/11.
According the group’s facebook page, “Mainstream media networks have barely touched the surface of what happened… Through their negligence, they have made a mockery of the unanswered questions held by the victims’ families, and greatly dishonored the 3,000 people who died on 9/11. This must change.”
The group is urging those who agree to join the boycott, during which participants will rely only on independent media sources for their news. On their page, the group suggests several alternatives to mainstream news, including Raw Story and Information Clearinghouse.
The organizers of the boycott make several demands of the corporate media, including “giving sufficient air time to the September 11th Advocates and members of the Family Steering Committee who called for a new investigation as a result of the shortcomings of the Commission.”
A similar but unrelated campaign, called Unplug The Signal, is encouraging the public to do away with TV altogether. Activist artist Nathan Janes says the campaign “draws attention to the gross manipulation of reality that is broadcast by the six major corporations controlling the content of television.”
The Mainstream Media Boycott for 9/11 Justice starts on September 11, 2010 at 12 am.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8THJsKserXU&feature=player_embedded#at=28
2010-08-12
He who controls the past, controls the future
I was an active participant on Alternet until they changed their page layout and comment format. They purposely crippled the comment section for over a month under the guise of:
Be that as it may, slowly over the course of 3 months or so, I observed them deliberately crippling their own comment archives to articles. First, it was that the new comment format couldn't display them correctly to all nested levels, but if you had a deep link, you could get to them all. This proved that it wasn't the database, but how that information was parsed and re-formatted. Then it was those levels getting truncated. Then it was nothing displayed at all. Now in many cases those lengthy, wonderful, insightful comments -- even when the trolls attempted detours into flame wars -- are replaced in many cases with Digg & Twitter feeds that weren't even supported at the time of the original article.
The 9/11 disinformation warriors from NSA's Q-group lost many battles and finally had to do triage and clean-up by destroying those records. Google isn't up to speed, and specific searches can still get you hints at the debates but no longer directly to them.
I've participate in at least two other forums that underwent upgrades in their technology, which also served to boot off the regulars (and 9/11 Truthers). Those upgrades eventually made those database archives, where all aspects of 9/11 were publicly debated, inaccessible slowly over time. On the one hand, I can understand issues with cutting over from one database to another. On the other hand, they deliberately threw away the zeitgeist of our time and the public record that proved (then and for any future database archaeologist) that not everyone in the years after 9/11 was a complete, gullible idiot.
I've recently learned of a 9/11 Truther in another forum who is experiencing the disappearance of whole discussion threads on 9/11 the very next day. It came to my attention, because he suspected that his opponent under a new alias was also mine.
My opponent certainly had either in-roads with AlterNet or hacking skills to get into their database, based on what I observed. Blatant personal attacks [starting on the subject line] from him would remain despite numerous requests for their moderation, while suddenly out of the blue rather benign but possibly too personal (or not in agreement with the persona) postings of his would be removed from the system. It was suspected that he requested or effected their removal. Therefore, when a series of his personal attacks went way over the line, he was asked early on a Sunday morning to request their removal. Sunday before noon, 5 of them were gone and by Wednesday, they all were.
George Orwell wrote in 1984 as the party slogan:
Is this what we're observing in the message boards of our day?
"We're doing software development on-the-fly on this live & popular website and can't seem to get it right."I think it was to drive away the regulars, because the 9/11 Truthers were certainly beginning to out numbering the 9/11 Coincidence Theorists and just about any political topic could legitimately be steered there. Those defending the government version had to dig deep into their bag of dirty tricks by often and fragrantly violating the posting policies about person attacks. After all, when you are losing the debate against the message, attack the messenger.
Be that as it may, slowly over the course of 3 months or so, I observed them deliberately crippling their own comment archives to articles. First, it was that the new comment format couldn't display them correctly to all nested levels, but if you had a deep link, you could get to them all. This proved that it wasn't the database, but how that information was parsed and re-formatted. Then it was those levels getting truncated. Then it was nothing displayed at all. Now in many cases those lengthy, wonderful, insightful comments -- even when the trolls attempted detours into flame wars -- are replaced in many cases with Digg & Twitter feeds that weren't even supported at the time of the original article.
The 9/11 disinformation warriors from NSA's Q-group lost many battles and finally had to do triage and clean-up by destroying those records. Google isn't up to speed, and specific searches can still get you hints at the debates but no longer directly to them.
I've participate in at least two other forums that underwent upgrades in their technology, which also served to boot off the regulars (and 9/11 Truthers). Those upgrades eventually made those database archives, where all aspects of 9/11 were publicly debated, inaccessible slowly over time. On the one hand, I can understand issues with cutting over from one database to another. On the other hand, they deliberately threw away the zeitgeist of our time and the public record that proved (then and for any future database archaeologist) that not everyone in the years after 9/11 was a complete, gullible idiot.
I've recently learned of a 9/11 Truther in another forum who is experiencing the disappearance of whole discussion threads on 9/11 the very next day. It came to my attention, because he suspected that his opponent under a new alias was also mine.
My opponent certainly had either in-roads with AlterNet or hacking skills to get into their database, based on what I observed. Blatant personal attacks [starting on the subject line] from him would remain despite numerous requests for their moderation, while suddenly out of the blue rather benign but possibly too personal (or not in agreement with the persona) postings of his would be removed from the system. It was suspected that he requested or effected their removal. Therefore, when a series of his personal attacks went way over the line, he was asked early on a Sunday morning to request their removal. Sunday before noon, 5 of them were gone and by Wednesday, they all were.
George Orwell wrote in 1984 as the party slogan:
"He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future."
Is this what we're observing in the message boards of our day?
2010-07-15
President Obama's Most Inexplicable Failure
In response to "President Obama's Most Inexplicable Failure"
War crimes and murder don't have any time limitations on filing charges.
The (erroneous) belief that 9/11 was perpetrated soly by 19 hijackers has affixed us with penalties: wars, war profiteering, war crimes, deaths, maimings, injuries, Constitution shredding, rendition, torture, ... 9/11 was even participant in the looting of global wealth with stock bubbles, housing bubbles, banking bailouts, etc.
As long as we believe the government lie of 9/11, we can be sucked into continual war and bad public policy. Probing the trouble to the bottom requires seeing the 9/11 dot in the clear pattern of lies, disception, and crimes foisted on us by the US Government and the Bush Administration in particular.
To ignore 9/11 truth is to shred everything we individually and collectively stand for as Americans, as patriots, and adherents of some religious faith like Christianity, Islam.
The 9/11 Litmus Test has to be re-framed in accordance with a trend line that is based on science and doesn't shirk from the truth -- where ever it may lead, whatever public figure is discredited for supporting and propagating lies, and whatever government institutions are scattered to the four winds of heaven in consequence of un-Constitutional, illegal, and immoral deeds.
The reframing of the 9/11 Litmus Test should begin with the 1,100 architects and engineers who are calling for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01. To these professionals, the math and physics in the destruction of these buildings do not add up.
No longer will it be acceptable to make decisions or take positions that contradict sound science.
"Perhaps the greatest fantasy of the present moment is that there is a choice here. We can look forward or backward, turn the page on history or not. Don't believe it. History matters."
~ Tom Engelhardt
"Belief produces the results of belief, and the penalties it affixes last so long as the belief and are inseparable from it. The remedy consists in probing the trouble to the bottom."
~ Mary Baker Eddy
War crimes and murder don't have any time limitations on filing charges.
The (erroneous) belief that 9/11 was perpetrated soly by 19 hijackers has affixed us with penalties: wars, war profiteering, war crimes, deaths, maimings, injuries, Constitution shredding, rendition, torture, ... 9/11 was even participant in the looting of global wealth with stock bubbles, housing bubbles, banking bailouts, etc.
As long as we believe the government lie of 9/11, we can be sucked into continual war and bad public policy. Probing the trouble to the bottom requires seeing the 9/11 dot in the clear pattern of lies, disception, and crimes foisted on us by the US Government and the Bush Administration in particular.
To ignore 9/11 truth is to shred everything we individually and collectively stand for as Americans, as patriots, and adherents of some religious faith like Christianity, Islam.
The 9/11 Litmus Test has to be re-framed in accordance with a trend line that is based on science and doesn't shirk from the truth -- where ever it may lead, whatever public figure is discredited for supporting and propagating lies, and whatever government institutions are scattered to the four winds of heaven in consequence of un-Constitutional, illegal, and immoral deeds.
The reframing of the 9/11 Litmus Test should begin with the 1,100 architects and engineers who are calling for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01. To these professionals, the math and physics in the destruction of these buildings do not add up.
No longer will it be acceptable to make decisions or take positions that contradict sound science.
"The avoidance of justice and the denial of truth tend to perpetuate sin, invoke crime, jeopardize self-control, and mock divine mercy."
~ Mary Baker Eddy
2010-07-14
Stop BP's Poisoning of the Gulf
Dear Senator Udall, Senator Bennet, and Representative Markey,
The Gulf of Mexico is being poisoned, not just by the BP oil gusher, but by misguided BP clean-up efforts that use Corexit, which is 4 times more toxic than the oil it acts on and complicates efforts that normally would have collected oil from the surface.
The pollution of the Gulf is going to affect everyone, even those of us in Colorado. The environmental damage won't be localized to that tainted food supply, as weather brings the poisons in land and begins to affect water supplies & food production elsewhere. Communities will be forced to migrate for economic, health, and food supply reasons. It will for sure impact even Colorado.
The old adage went that if you weren't part of the solution, you were part of the problem.
http://www.stopthespraying.org/
Time for you to lead. Control needs to be taken from BP & their multinational banking owners who answer to no one except obscene profits at the expense of our economy, our environment, and our peace & security.
While I have your attention, you should be aware that the 9/11 Litmus Test has been re-framed. No longer will it be acceptable to make decisions or take positions that contradict sound science. The unacceptable BP experimentation with Corexit in the Gulf is an example from today; YOU NEED TO STOP IT.
However, if you take the government's word on 9/11 at face value, basic high school physics proves that it was a fraud, which in turn makes fraudulent Afghanistan, Iraq, the USA PATRIOT ACT, and most of the emphasis of congress since 9/11. Truth can be suppressed for a time in favor of a lie, but Truth -- unlike the lie -- cannot be killed. This is not only why the 9/11 Truth Movement continues to grow, but also why 9/11 will be the Achilles Heel of EVERYONE in elected office who remains silent or an ignorant echo of "America was attacked on 9/11 by 19 Muslim extremist who wrought all of the observed destruction." No. When links to all outsources are revealed, 9/11 will prove to be a self-inflicted wound for the twin goals of covering up the misdeeds of Bush I and achieving the PNAC (and Israeli) shopping list.
Viewed in this light and within the re-framed 9/11 Litmus Test that is based on sound science (and not politicized pseudo-science), the so-called banking "crisis" and other slight-of-hand transfer of wealth con-games to destroy economies (& environments) globally and to reward corporations put our republic on the brink of collapse, whereby no amount of suppressing these machinations from the public will preserve it or your respected elected position. Truth is the only thing that can establish your place in heaven and the history books.
I encourage you to read Dr. David Ray Griffin's article: "Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?"
Also "Reframing the 9/11 Litmus Test"
Sincerely,
Maxwell C. Bridges
The Gulf of Mexico is being poisoned, not just by the BP oil gusher, but by misguided BP clean-up efforts that use Corexit, which is 4 times more toxic than the oil it acts on and complicates efforts that normally would have collected oil from the surface.
The pollution of the Gulf is going to affect everyone, even those of us in Colorado. The environmental damage won't be localized to that tainted food supply, as weather brings the poisons in land and begins to affect water supplies & food production elsewhere. Communities will be forced to migrate for economic, health, and food supply reasons. It will for sure impact even Colorado.
The old adage went that if you weren't part of the solution, you were part of the problem.
http://www.stopthespraying.org/
Time for you to lead. Control needs to be taken from BP & their multinational banking owners who answer to no one except obscene profits at the expense of our economy, our environment, and our peace & security.
While I have your attention, you should be aware that the 9/11 Litmus Test has been re-framed. No longer will it be acceptable to make decisions or take positions that contradict sound science. The unacceptable BP experimentation with Corexit in the Gulf is an example from today; YOU NEED TO STOP IT.
However, if you take the government's word on 9/11 at face value, basic high school physics proves that it was a fraud, which in turn makes fraudulent Afghanistan, Iraq, the USA PATRIOT ACT, and most of the emphasis of congress since 9/11. Truth can be suppressed for a time in favor of a lie, but Truth -- unlike the lie -- cannot be killed. This is not only why the 9/11 Truth Movement continues to grow, but also why 9/11 will be the Achilles Heel of EVERYONE in elected office who remains silent or an ignorant echo of "America was attacked on 9/11 by 19 Muslim extremist who wrought all of the observed destruction." No. When links to all outsources are revealed, 9/11 will prove to be a self-inflicted wound for the twin goals of covering up the misdeeds of Bush I and achieving the PNAC (and Israeli) shopping list.
Viewed in this light and within the re-framed 9/11 Litmus Test that is based on sound science (and not politicized pseudo-science), the so-called banking "crisis" and other slight-of-hand transfer of wealth con-games to destroy economies (& environments) globally and to reward corporations put our republic on the brink of collapse, whereby no amount of suppressing these machinations from the public will preserve it or your respected elected position. Truth is the only thing that can establish your place in heaven and the history books.
I encourage you to read Dr. David Ray Griffin's article: "Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?"
Also "Reframing the 9/11 Litmus Test"
Sincerely,
Maxwell C. Bridges
2010-07-11
Miracles and the Re-framed 9/11 Litmus Test
In some of my skirmishes with 9/11 coincidence theorists (who believe that 9/11 was just one big, rinky-dinky, coincidence), I'd sometimes tease them about their Christian faith that they often wore on their sleeves as a shield along with the American flag as their cape in their self-righteous super (in)human & fervently patriotic defense of the indefensible, like torture, rendition, write-off of habeas corpus, predator drones, war profiteering, etc.
I'd inform them that if they truly believed and supported the Bush Administration's official 9/11 version, why had they not converted to Islam for the many wonders and miracles of Allah on 9/11 that 19 Muslim hijackers accomplished, even the bending of Allah's laws of conservation of energy & momentum in the incredible gravitational acceleration observed in the destruction of 3 buildings and the supposed jet fuel & office furniture fires that burned at steel melting temperatures for weeks under the piles of rubble without the aid of oxygen from the air?
Ironic, then, not only that these 9/11 coincidence theorists did not convert to Islam in awe of these Allah wrought miracles but also that the evil spawns of 9/11 -- like wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- persecuted Muslims and had undercurrents of a holy war of the world's great religions.
I write the above somewhat with tongue-in-cheek and certainly meaning no disrespect against Islam (or Christianity) but with heaping disrespect against hypocracy of those who don't practice what they preach in the religious realm and more importantly in the scientific realm.
The re-framed 9/11 Litmus Test has us view the 9/11 events with the lens of math, physics, and science to determine more accurate and more plausible explanations. Or as the case of the recent additions to this series bring to light, to use science to refute what we were told to open our minds to other alternatves.
Dr. David Ray Griffin 's article "Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?" is well researched and annotated to speak for and support itself.
The articles about the improbable speeds of the 9/11 aircraft are noteworthy for the implications not explicitly mentioned therein, but for re-animating in my mind two theories (not necessarily mutually exclusive) that 9/11 deniers feverishly worked to discredit by any means possible.
#1: The commercial aircraft that gave the world the "this could have been you on that plane" shock-&-awe were swapped mid-flight with planes that not only could achieve those speeds but also might have had some extra "punch" in the form of explosive payloads. The multiple war games of the day assisted this swap through the insertion & deletion of radar blips into air traffic controllers' equipment. Swapped planes could then explain (possibly) cellphone calls if the commercial aircraft were already landed at the time.
#2: I hesitate to bring this up due to my own fence-sitting on the matter, but falsified radar blips traveling at excessive speeds would dovetail nicely with the (supposedly debunked) "no plane" (or "no commercial planes") theories (Google: "September Clues") whereby computer generated images (CGI) were foisted on the public through the media. Of the 9 or so segments in S.Clues, only 2 or 3 of them as I recall had plausible debunking; the others still held water. It should be noted that on the day of 9/11 in the first several hours, only 1 clip of the 2nd airplane was shown over and over (with an excessively tall & annoying bottom-of-screen banner), which gave sufficient time for subsequent footage to be found and CGI tweaked. Over the course of the next few days the other clips appear of the 2nd plane & 1 clip of the first. Of the S.Clues still of value in my books:
I honestly do not know and would be content for this wild-ass speculation to be proven wrong. 9/11 being an inside job does not live or die with the CGI/no-planer theories being true or plane swaps being true. Free-fall in the destruction of the buildings already makes that case, along with all of the other so-called miracles given in Dr. David Ray Griffin's articles.
Please read "Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?"
I'd inform them that if they truly believed and supported the Bush Administration's official 9/11 version, why had they not converted to Islam for the many wonders and miracles of Allah on 9/11 that 19 Muslim hijackers accomplished, even the bending of Allah's laws of conservation of energy & momentum in the incredible gravitational acceleration observed in the destruction of 3 buildings and the supposed jet fuel & office furniture fires that burned at steel melting temperatures for weeks under the piles of rubble without the aid of oxygen from the air?
Ironic, then, not only that these 9/11 coincidence theorists did not convert to Islam in awe of these Allah wrought miracles but also that the evil spawns of 9/11 -- like wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- persecuted Muslims and had undercurrents of a holy war of the world's great religions.
I write the above somewhat with tongue-in-cheek and certainly meaning no disrespect against Islam (or Christianity) but with heaping disrespect against hypocracy of those who don't practice what they preach in the religious realm and more importantly in the scientific realm.
The re-framed 9/11 Litmus Test has us view the 9/11 events with the lens of math, physics, and science to determine more accurate and more plausible explanations. Or as the case of the recent additions to this series bring to light, to use science to refute what we were told to open our minds to other alternatves.
Dr. David Ray Griffin 's article "Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?" is well researched and annotated to speak for and support itself.
The articles about the improbable speeds of the 9/11 aircraft are noteworthy for the implications not explicitly mentioned therein, but for re-animating in my mind two theories (not necessarily mutually exclusive) that 9/11 deniers feverishly worked to discredit by any means possible.
#1: The commercial aircraft that gave the world the "this could have been you on that plane" shock-&-awe were swapped mid-flight with planes that not only could achieve those speeds but also might have had some extra "punch" in the form of explosive payloads. The multiple war games of the day assisted this swap through the insertion & deletion of radar blips into air traffic controllers' equipment. Swapped planes could then explain (possibly) cellphone calls if the commercial aircraft were already landed at the time.
#2: I hesitate to bring this up due to my own fence-sitting on the matter, but falsified radar blips traveling at excessive speeds would dovetail nicely with the (supposedly debunked) "no plane" (or "no commercial planes") theories (Google: "September Clues") whereby computer generated images (CGI) were foisted on the public through the media. Of the 9 or so segments in S.Clues, only 2 or 3 of them as I recall had plausible debunking; the others still held water. It should be noted that on the day of 9/11 in the first several hours, only 1 clip of the 2nd airplane was shown over and over (with an excessively tall & annoying bottom-of-screen banner), which gave sufficient time for subsequent footage to be found and CGI tweaked. Over the course of the next few days the other clips appear of the 2nd plane & 1 clip of the first. Of the S.Clues still of value in my books:
- the speed with which the official govt version was planted and re-enforced in the media;
- the supposedly different network TV views as per surrounding buildings & distant bridges that had essentially the same WTC tower perspective;
- the very lucky and coincidental zoom-in just before the 2nd plane strike, yet upon calculation of the speed and playback in reverse to the starting zoom-out position does not show the plane and it should have;
- the footage from the local news helicopter that does not show the 2nd plane when it should have and doesn't get a reaction from the reporter or pilot in the helicopter until after the fireball explosion is seen;
- several audio-only recordings that did not catch the very loud noise of a jet flying at excessive speeds at a low altitude but did record the "plop" of the impact & fireball.
I honestly do not know and would be content for this wild-ass speculation to be proven wrong. 9/11 being an inside job does not live or die with the CGI/no-planer theories being true or plane swaps being true. Free-fall in the destruction of the buildings already makes that case, along with all of the other so-called miracles given in Dr. David Ray Griffin's articles.
Please read "Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?"
2010-05-27
Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight
A SCAD is "State Crimes Against Democracy". In an earlier article in this series "Reframing the 9/11 Litmus Test", I wrote:
The article below passes the reframed 9/11 Litmus Test and is based on science.
Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight
David Ray Griffin
Published May 27, 2010
911Truth.org
At 5:21 PM on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been hit by a plane – a fact that is important because of the widespread acceptance of the idea, in spite of its scientific absurdity, that the Twin Towers collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airliners plus the ensuing jet-fuel-fed fires. The collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) thereby challenges the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, according to which it was accomplished by al-Qaeda hijackers, even if one accepts the government’s scientifically impossible account of the Twin Towers. This fact was recently emphasized in the title of a review article based on my 2009 book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7,1 by National Medal of Science-winner Lynn Margulis: “Two Hit, Three Down – The Biggest Lie.”2
Read more >>
[T]he 9/11 Litmus Test has to be re-framed in accordance with a 9/11 trend line that is based on science and doesn't shirk from the truth -- where ever it may lead, whatever public figure is discredited for supporting and propagating lies, and whatever government institutions are scattered to the four winds of heaven in consequence of un-Constitutional, illegal, and immoral deeds.
The reframing of the 9/11 Litmus Test should begin with the 1,100 architects and engineers who are calling for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01. To these professionals, the math and physics in the destruction of these buildings do not add up.
The article below passes the reframed 9/11 Litmus Test and is based on science.
Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight
David Ray Griffin
Published May 27, 2010
911Truth.org
At 5:21 PM on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been hit by a plane – a fact that is important because of the widespread acceptance of the idea, in spite of its scientific absurdity, that the Twin Towers collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airliners plus the ensuing jet-fuel-fed fires. The collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) thereby challenges the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, according to which it was accomplished by al-Qaeda hijackers, even if one accepts the government’s scientifically impossible account of the Twin Towers. This fact was recently emphasized in the title of a review article based on my 2009 book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7,1 by National Medal of Science-winner Lynn Margulis: “Two Hit, Three Down – The Biggest Lie.”2
Read more >>
2010-04-27
Passing the Reframed 9/11 Litmus Test
Here's some examples of articles that pass the Reframed 9/11 Litmus Test.
- Key Expert Calls FBI's Theory About Accused Anthrax Terrorist 'Impossible': A microbiologist who supervised the work of accused anthrax killer Bruce E. Ivins explained to a National Academy of Sciences panel Thursday why the arithmetic of growing anthrax didn't add up to Ivins' mailing deadly spores in fall 2001.
- Airline pilot cleared of role in 9/11 after 'nine years of hell': The pilot falsely accused of training the hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks has won his almost decade-long miscarriage of justice battle. Lotfi Raissi, an Algerian living in Britain who lost his career as an airline pilot, suffered wrongful imprisonment and damage to his health, will now be eligible for up to £2m compensation.
- Hashmi: Finally, a Trial!: After close to three years in solitary confinement in a federal detention center in New York City, the 29-year-old Queens-born American citizen, Syed Fahad Hashmi, will finally get his day in court. He will be charged with conspiracy to provide material support to Al Qaeda
- Al-Qaeda Chief In Iraq: Captured, Killed, Never Actually Existed, Re-Captured, Now Killed Again: U.S. and Iraqi officials have today announced that two “Al-Qaeda in Iraq” leaders have been killed in an air strike carried out by American troops. A major flaw in the story that seems to have been overlooked, is that both of the men have already been reported captured and killed on several occasions, with U.S. officials also having previously declared one of them a “fictional character” that was invented by the other!
- The Self-Importance of Being Robert M. Gates: Gates' credibility has always been a subject of controversy since he lied to a Congressional committee in 1987 about his knowledge of Iran-contra and was forced to withdraw his nomination as CIA director.
2010-04-18
Reframing the 9/11 Litmus Test
"Gods are fragile things; they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense."
~ Chapman Cohen (1868-1954)
In chemistry, Litmus paper turns blue in a basic solution and red in an acidic solution. The 9/11 Litmus test metaphorically turns the face of public figures the patriotic blue or red of the America flag depending on whether they are coolly repeating elements of the government's 9/11 story in order to justify national security measures and military actions or they are hotly belittling alternative 9/11 views as crazy, nutty, loony, conspiracy theories.
Acting in this manner, our public figures have to date seemingly passed their 9/11 Litmus test and thereby continued to reap the rewards that maintain them in their public place as "respected" politician, news anchor, political columnist, professor, etc. Questioning any aspect of 9/11 and specifically the government has been tantamount to failing the 9/11 Litmus test with consequences that include political or professional discreditation and involuntary job loss.
Math- and science-challenged Americans ought well remember that white is the third color both of their patriotic flag lapel pins as well as of the simple chemistry Litmus test. Namely, when the Litmus paper remains white in a given solution, (a) the solution may be neither acidic nor basic, or (b) the solution may be known acidic or basic and the test paper isn't Litmus paper.
When over 1,100 architects and engineers sign a petition to call for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001, the 9/11 Litmus reaction in the corporate mainstream media was: white. Or white out, clear, blank, and silent. It wasn't meaningfully covered (and Tiger Woods was).
Any 9/11 view that includes controlled demolition is political acid and should have resulted in red-faced commentators deriding these architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth as insane. Why didn't this happen and isn't it happening now?
The most obvious reason is that those rosy-cheek commentators -- despite their silver tongues, silver quills, and rhetorical eloquence -- did not have the scientific understanding to go toe-to-toe against these professional architects and engineers on their home court of Newtonian physics as questions are raised about the gaps, misdirections, and omissions in the government's scientific reports on 9/11.
Like any good Litmus Test, white out in the presence of this acidic 9/11 news indicates that the 9/11 Litmus Test that our nation has been applying is a fraud.
The faulty acid test has been hiding that it isn't the war on terror, but the war of terror that America inflicts on the world.
The faulty base test ("the base" = "Al Quaeda") has been hiding the distinct possibility of 19 pawns and patsies, Mossad and high-level U.S. government involvement, and any Al Quaeda growth and activity since 9/11 being blow-back and inspired by us.
The knee-jerk, red-faced, "kook" labeling of anyone who questioned the government's 9/11 version is just as fraudulent as the blue-faced government leaders continuing to justify wars (torture, rules of engagement, Predator drones, DU munitions, and other crimes against humanity and the Constitution) on the basis of national security and America being attacked on 9/11 by Al Quaeda. The world knows that the invasion of Iraq was predicated on lies that were foisted through fear on the American people, as were many other foreign and domestic policies to get us to surrender our civil liberties.
"There's a big difference between the trend lines and the headlines, and one of the things that you need to be able to do ... is to draw that distinction: to understand when you see a headline, if it's troubling or good, whether it's consistent with the trend line. And to know that it is your job as citizens... to try to build your trend lines." [May 2003] "Half the stuff that makes the headlines every day you know instinctively are just fleeting dross. They don't amount to anything. And then some things represent trend lines. They reflect things that show big underlying sweeping changes in society." [March 2007]
~ President Bill Clinton
As of this moment, the 9/11 Litmus Test has to be re-framed in accordance with a 9/11 trend line that is based on science and doesn't shirk from the truth -- where ever it may lead, whatever public figure is discredited for supporting and propagating lies, and whatever government institutions are scattered to the four winds of heaven in consequence of un-Constitutional, illegal, and immoral deeds.
+++
The reframing of the 9/11 Litmus Test should begin with the 1,100 architects and engineers who are calling for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01. To these professionals, the math and physics in the destruction of these buildings do not add up.
The new 9/11 Litmus Test will include a buried passage in NIST's Final Report on WTC-7:
"In stage 2, the North face descended at gravitational acceleration as the buckled columns provided negligible support to the upper portion of the North face. The free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories or 32.0 meters (105 feet), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 and t= 4.0 seconds."
Scientific things to note:
- Gravitational acceleration is another phrase for free-fall.
- The entire roof line (or upper mass), not just the North face, can be observed in free-fall in this stage 2 from several videos.
- Free-fall means that all of the potential energy of the upper portion was converted into kinetic energy (accelerating motion) and that no energy from the falling mass during that stage could be consumed by destroying columns and building content.
- A damaged, buckling, or fire weakened column offers measurable support that impedes or slows downward acceleration.
- Steel columns cannot transition suddenly from "measurable support" to "negligible support," unless an other energy source is added.
- All columns, whether or not weakened, across the entire length and width of each of 8 stories were reduced to "negligible support" before the upper portion fell through their space, otherwise free-fall would not have been observable.
+++
The new 9/11 Litmus Test demands not only that public and private citizens acknowledge the observable free-fall anomalies, but also that they openly discuss its ramifications in the observed WTC-7 collapse, in the entire 9/11 event, and in the larger political context that draws trend lines through these dots, PNAC mission statements, un-Constitutional domestic and foreign policies, military engagements, and American empirialism abroad.
Just a few of the ramifications of free-fall in WTC-7 are that:
- Controlled demolition was the most likely extra energy source that suddenly transitioned supporting columns into negligible support to bring down WTC-7.
- Controlled demolition could only be achieved with extended periods of access to the building.
- The destruction technology used (nano-thermite) in this controlled demolition is something few on the planet have access to.
- Thus, the circle of 9/11 conspirators was much larger than 19 hijackers and included insiders.
- If one WTC building was felled with controlled demolition, they all were.
- Some of those same insiders slowed and distracted our response to known threats, delayed our investigation, compromised the investigation, feverishly worked to cover it up, and continue to distract, disinform, and cover it over.
- The unholy spawns of 9/11 (Afghanistan, Iraq, torture, USA PATRIOT ACT, etc.) and the deceit in their genesis need to be viewed through the lens of the new 9/11 Litmus Test, otherwise the purposes of a cover-up are served rather than of the open discussions needed in a free society.
- House cleaning is requisite at all levels of governmental leadership and all secretive agencies, otherwise our republic will not survive.
Keep in mind that 9/11 is not a political pendulum swinging between progressive and conservative views. 9/11, having been built and predicated on lies, can only swing one way: towards the truth.
You may or may not have the guts to pursue your own objective investigation of 9/11 starting with the links provided. But if you value your contribution to the lasting legacy of these times, you can no longer be trying to pass the old 9/11 Litmus Test; you have to go with the truth.
"Though error hides behind a lie and excuses guilt, error cannot forever be concealed. Truth, through her eternal laws, unveils error. Truth causes sin to betray itself, and sets upon error the mark of the beast. Even the disposition to excuse guilt or to conceal it is punished. The avoidance of justice and the denial of truth tend to perpetuate sin, invoke crime, jeopardize self-control, and mock divine mercy."
~ Mary Baker Eddy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)