Raw Nuclear DEW Research

Raw Nuclear DEW Research

Maxwell C. Bridges
2015-07-11

Expand All Part / Hide All Part

Expand All Sections / Hide All Sections

During a period of unemployment in 2015, I obtained a library card to my institution of higher education. This gave me access to not only their public bookstacks, but also to online repositories of information to which the library subscribed.

The goal of the research was to learn the approximate state of DEW and nuclear technology at the turn of the century (2000) from the public record. Literature searches were limited by date and topic. Much could be learned of the revelance of material from its abstract, which is generally easily accessible from repository search results and doesn't require going behind pay-walls (via a personally paid subsciption).

Online make it easy to simply create a list of everything coming from the search results. If interesting, copy what is relevant from its abstract. Deep-dive into the publication if the scent-of-the-information from the abstract deemed it worthy, and put those citations also into the list.

FGNW Discussions Vol. 1

The following discussions happened over a two year period primarily on Facebook, but also in other discussion forums and by e-mail. They were attempts by me to have rational discussions about 9/11 fourth generation nuclear devices, and tangentially about nano-thermite and about the "No Planes Theory" (NPT).

In most cases, my discussion partners resembled what a conspiracy theorist would expect as boots-to-the-ground infiltration of on-line forums, and controlling the message. Some are classic disinformation, defended poorly, unwilling to acknowledge weaknesses in premise, exhibiting in cases bot-tells in the engagement.

These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown.

Remnants of Truth & Shadows

Although I was in exile from Truth & Shadows, I was able to check in from time-to-time. I caught passages written by others worthy of preservation and response. Alas, my responses were written but had to wait for publication and exposure until now, except what could reach participants through email.

NPT and Internet Bots

---

Debunking NPT (No Planes Theory) isn't my hobby-horse. I do it more as a community service. I had been duped 2009-2012 by NPT as provided by September Clues and its crafty Parts 1 thru 9 and A thru H. But I was open-minded and objective with regards to further analysis and research, such that I acknowledged when pillars of my NPT beliefs were destroyed and I had to recant and apologize.

"Doing unto others, as I would have them do to me...". I did not relish having my "open-minded and objective" nature (e.g., super powers of being naive and trusting, until given reason not to) be taken advantage of. I want to spare my fellow yeomen in the 9/11 Truth Movement similar embarrassment for having been duped. So I've had more spins than necessary trying to set the record straight.

"And I would have succeeded to, were it not for those pesky [agents & bots]". This work contains NPT rounds 5 through 7. For completeness, the following has links to previous NPT rounds.

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

This article makes the prima facie case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11. "A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party."

Note: A 2016 version "Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW " has been circulated on various websites and Facebook groups catering toward 9/11 discussions. Neither those championing the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) nor those in various camps of 9/11 truth (e.g., nano-thermite, DEW) have disproved or rebutted FGNW. Many exhibit tactics & traits of a disinformationalist. Common features across many forums were mockery, game playing, and avoidance of objectively discussing any of the specifics presented in the establishment of the FGNW presumption, followed by eventual banishment from the forum.

Trend line to shut down 9/11 nuclear considerations

Objective & rational thinkers know that if theory X is missing pieces, then further research into X is required before it can be deemed complete. If theory Y has X's missing pieces, then maybe X & Y ought to shack up for a bit to see if they are compatible.

The following are discussions to persuade Woodsian DEW supporters that shacking up with nuclear FGNW might complete and validate their theory.

These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line (exhibited even on Truth & Shadows) dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown using any and all of the available disinformation techniques, up to and including banishment.

Emails from T&S exile

Truth & Shadows run by Mr. Craig McKee has had me in exile. Several postings or comments over the year rose to the level where I thought I should respond, generally via email but sometimes by comments that have not been published. There is no small amount of irony between Mr. McKee's experiences in various Facebook discussion groups (e.g., trolled, banished) and my T&S tenure. Mr. McKee articulates his position on 9/11 nuclear devices (and by extension "me").

These discussions sadly add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be suppressed.

Minor points about 9/11

{mcb: Below are 9/11 discussion points of view that I am tired of repeating. Being a lazy hue-mahn, the carousel rides over repeated territory may now cause me to regurgitate the following.}

Debunking NPT@WTC

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-Hole Warning! This entry publishes part 2 through part 4 as a continuation of Facebook (and email) discussions on the theme of NPT@WTC (no plane theory at the WTC on 9/11). As I wrote to Dr. James Henry Fetzer:

Debunking NPT at the WTC is not my 9/11 hobby-horse; FGNW is. I only do it as a favor to a fellow duped useful idiot who prides himself on being objective enough to let himself get duped another way with new informaion and/or properly applied science and logical analysis.

Censure on T&S

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-hole warning! Re-purposes discussions on Truth & Shadows that were of interest to me, even though I was in exile. Sometimes comments were authored by me even knowing that they might never be published until now.

Attempts at Rational 9/11 Discussion

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

---

x1 Maxwell C. Bridges : Behold examples of disinformation in action

2016-06-12

The following were attempts by me to have rational discussions about fourth generation nuclear devices on 9/11. Most of the parts in this article transpired on Facebook. By the very act of posting links to my blog article on FGNW, I attempted to move the discussion there. The following document many spins on the carousel.