Hide All / Expand All
by Maxwell C. Bridges
2024-04-11
Hide All /
Show
This is version 3 -- scaled-down to 2k-words -- of "9/11 Exotic Nuclear Weapons" submitted to the International Center for 9/11 Justice on 2024-08-25.
The destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001 was accomplished using "exotic," fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW). They were hybrid-fission/fusion and released 80% of their tactical nuclear yield as highly-energetic neutrons in a conic, targeted fashion, thus permitting multiple tandem devices.
Modern hybrid nuclear devices use a conventional chemical-based charge to smash fissile material together in the fission stage, whose sole purpose is to generate the requisite heat for the fusion stage. From this building block, the fusion stage has one of three designs.
Thermo-nuclear: releases 95% of its nuclear yield as a thermal pulse and blast effects, and 5% as prompt radiation and EMP.
"Neutron-bomb": releases 80% of its nuclear yield as prompt radiation, such as high-energy neutrons and gamma rays in a spherical or semi-spherical emission, and only 20% as thermal pulse, blast effects, and EMP.
"Exotic" FGNW: releases 80% of its nuclear yield as highly energetic neutrons in a conic-shaped from the ignition point, and then 20% as thermal pulse, blast effects, and EMP.
Aside from an earlier book, Dr. Andre Gsponer wrote the peer-reviewed article in 2005: "Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military effectiveness and collateral effects"
https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0510071
According to Dr. Andre Gsponer, FGNW are primarily very intense sources of penetrating radiation that can produce direct work on a target and thus induce a very different response within their targets. Depending on design goals, FGNW can:
- Generate a fireball (in air or a material).
- Launch a shockwave (in air or in a material).
- Heat the surface of a material.
- Accelerate or compress a material.
- Transfer momentum to a material.
- Heat the volume of a material.
- Energize a working material.
- Forge and project missiles.
- Form and send high-velocity jets.
- Ablate a material and produce a shock wave in it.
Here are crude examples of possible tandem FGNW installation and configuration in just a few of the WTC buildings.
Here are possible tandem FGNW installations and configurations in just a few of the WTC buildings.
-
The following image shows the partial FGNW configuration for one WTC tower.
Note that the detonation level is five or ten (or more) stories below where the effects are observed coming out of the outer wall assemblies.
The following image shows a sequence for the initial moments of WTC-2 tower's destruction.
- Left-most rendering: Has only fires and billowing smoke from WTC-2.
- Second from left rendering: The inside content and through the roof of WTC-2 is zapped.
- Third from left: Causes the upper-stories to lean towards WTC-4.
- Fourth from left: Before the angular momentum of a cohesive block becomes an issue, FGNW from lower in the tower zap upwards through inside content. The expanding cone at this point grazes the outer wall assemblies of the upper stories. Angular momentum is halted because the wall assemblies are no longer connected at the corners to other faces of the towers.
- Right-most rendering: Approximately 30 stories from the one-side of the upper block are separated and fall towards WTC-4 and all around the tower's footprint.
The following image continues the sequence for the initial moments of WTC-2 tower's destruction.
- Left-most rendering: Approximately 30 stories from the one-side of the upper block are separated and fall towards WTC-4 and all around the tower's footprint.
- Second from left: While subsequent demolition levels in WTC-4 dustify content and send wall assemblies from higher above scattering, FGNW are ignited where WTC-4 main edifice was.
- Third from left: Content-rich clouds rise up from WTC-4 and meet the falling wall assemblies from WTC-2.
- Right-most rendering: a section of inner core that had remained briefly standing like a multi-record player spindle after the albums dropped. This was nicknamed "the spire", and it suddenly telescoped in on itself.
Both towers' destruction had elements of a "spire" of inner-core that remained briefly standing after the building around it was dustified and wall assemblies peeled off. This is given as a purple line going up the middle of the towers. Its purpose in the FGNW paradigm?
Ignition to full nuclear yield may have had a time element associated with. The nuclear yield itself might have had a time duration. As such, requisite would be a stable platform to mount the FGNW on that won't be immediately destroyed by the device itself, by its neighboring devices at that level, or by devices at lower detonation levels. A clean-up operation later can remove the remnant spire.
The following image is an imcomplete beginning of the WTC-7 FGNW configuration. Note that all FGNW could be installed on the same lower level.
The following image shows an incomplete FGNW configuration for WTC-4.
Not depicted accurately: the footprint of the ground floor of WTC-4 was smaller than the footprint of its upper-stories that overhung the sidewalk. Theoretically, the placement of FGNW at WTC-4 could have been outside the building from inside, say, fake utility hubs, fake newspaper machines, or fake trash cans positioned around the building and under the overhang.
WTC-4 can be observed going up in fresh clouds of content-rich dust in many videos of the WTC-2 destruction.
The fission stage of FGNW generates the heat for fusion.
The evidence for fission in the WTC dust were first published in a report by the USGS and their analysis of dozens of dust samples.
[ http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/sample.location.html ]
The USGS report's data tables clearly document the fissile by-product elements (Uranium, Barium, Strontium) and their decay elements. The following image shows the nuclear decay paths from Uranium.
The fingerprints of fission were confirmed by the report "Characterization of the Dust/Smoke Aerosol that Settled East of the World Trade Center (WTC) in Lower Manhattan after the Collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001" by Paul Lioy et al.
[ https://archive.org/details/CharacterizationOfTheDustsmokeAerosolThatSettledEastOfTheWorldTrade_552 ]
The data tables in the WTC dust reports from both USGS and Paul Lioy have most of the elements in the periodic table. Both reports endeavor to have a plausible scientific explanation for why most of the given elements would be present at those quantities in the WTC dust.
Except for the fissile elements. Neither report has any explanation for why the dust would contain Uranium (U) and its decay elements Barium (Ba) and Strontium (Sr), and their subsequent decay elements. Or Chromium (Cr), known for usage in nuclear weapons.
Mr. Jeff Prager reviewed the USGS data and explains their true nuclear significance.
The USGS report on the dust provides compelling evidence
of the fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent
decay into Lithium. These correlations are the signature of a nuclear explosion and could not have occurred by chance.
The presence of rare Trace elements such as Cerium, Yttrium and
Lanthanum should have caught the attention of any nuclear physicist,
particularly when found in quantities of 50ppm to well over 100ppm. The
USGS report shows that these quantities vary widely from place to place
but still correlate with each other according to the relationships
expected from nuclear fission.
The USGS report shows Barium and Strontium present and in absolutely
astronomical concentrations of over 400ppm to over 3000ppm, varying from
place to place but varying in lockstep and according to known nuclear
relationships.
The presence of Thorium and Uranium correlated to each other by a
clear mathematical power relationship and to other radionuclide daughter
products.
The dust samples provide an unprecedented insight into the action of a
nuclear device. Nuclear weapon scientists should have seized this data to analyze it and determine exactly what type of device produced it.
However, both reports on the WTC dust prove a fission process was involved and that interference was required to control the nuclear narrative.
Tritium is a building block of fusion stages in many nuclear devices. Tritium's involvment with 9/11 is confirmed by the report:
"Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center"
by T.M. Semkow, R.S. Hafner, P.P Parekh, G.J. Wozniak, D.K. Haines, L. Husain, R.L. Rabun, P.G. Williams.
http://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/241096.pdf
Disclaimer: The tritium report was scope-limited from the onset to consider only "building & aircraft content" and to minimize public health concerns about tritium.
Despite its untrustworthy scope, the tritium report proves that a fusion process was involved and that interference was required to control the nuclear narrative.
The FNGW thesis suggests possible high temperatures from a FGNW's fission stage. But more importantly, the emitted cone of highly energetic neutrons passes right through content, leaving energy behind, often in the form of heat.
The RJ Lee report titled "WTC Dust Signature" identified in the dust "[s]pherical iron and spherical or vesicular silicate particles that result from exposure to high temperature."
The presence of lead oxide on the surface of mineral wool indicates the existence of extremely high temperatures during the collapse which caused metallic lead to volatilize, oxidize, and finally condense on the surface of the mineral wool.
The presence of molybdenum spherules documented by the USGS study. Molybdenum is known for its extremely high melting point of 2,623°C (4,754°F).
The following images of steel arches would require many minutes or more in a modern blast furnace. On 9/11, they were brought to a pliable state in a fraction of second.
The FGNW thesis suggests that the penetrating highly energetic neutrons achieved instantaneous volume heating of those steel beams, weakening them and causing them to sag under the forces of gravity.
The following images show WTC wall assemblies with bends.
The FGNW thesis suggests each of the four sides of the three hollow box colums were penetrated by the highly energetic neutrons beam causing localized volume heating and neat bending at the spandrel.
The following image shows a wall assembly exhibiting another anomaly, namely the four sides of all three box columns came apart at their welds with the inside face having head-induced wrinkles.
Professor Thomas Cahill of the the UC Davis DELTA Group (Detection and Evaluation of Long-range Transport of Aerosols) described some of this WTC finding on February 11, 2002.
http://911scholars.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nuclear-atmospheric-physicist-dr-thomas-cahill-on-911
"The air from Ground Zero was laden with extremely high amounts of very small particles, probably associated with high temperatures in the underground debris pile."
Many different metals were found in the samples of very fine particles, and some were found at the highest levels ever recorded in air in the United States.
Prof. Cahill also explained the meaning of the generation of the particles to reporters more clearly:
"The presence of coarse particles immediately after days of rain indicated that they were being continually re-generated from a dry, hot source, not re-suspended from roadways and other surfaces."
Nuclear devices of the 1st through 3rd generation in general could not be used in close-proximity tandem, because the spherical emission of neutrons would cause "Nuclear Fizzle" in neighboring devices.
A fizzle occurs when the detonation of a device for creating a
nuclear explosion (such as a nuclear weapon) grossly fails to meet its
expected yield. The bombs still detonate, but the detonation is much
less than anticipated. ... A fizzle can spread radioactive material
throughout the surrounding area, involve a partial fission reaction of
the fissile material, or both. For practical purposes, a fizzle can
still have considerable explosive yield when compared to conventional
weapons.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizzle_(nuclear_explosion)]
The FGNW thesis proposes multiple devices per detonation level in each WTC tower plus multiple devices in each of three other buildings in the WTC complex. This is possible because the neutron emission isn't spherical, but is conic and can be aimed so as not to foul neighbors.
Still, the 9/11 psyops wasn't perfect, and it is entirely possible for some of the multiple devices to get fouled or not initiate properly, but ultimately "nuclear fizzle" for months as underground hot-spots.
Not only was molten metal seen pouring out of WTC 2,
dozens of eyewitnesses observed it in the debris of all three buildings.
"Beyond Misinformation"
http://www.beyondmisinformation.org/ page 32
The FEMA/NIST captured video footage of the mangled state of steel wall assemblies and internal support beams that FGNW explains.
However, the video footage as a side-effect also caught real-time radiation emissions from the Ground Zero debris pile and specific pieces from the Fresh-Kills Landfill.
For digital cameras, the evidence of radiation is in the form of camera
scintillation -- flashes or sparkles of light -- as a result of radioactive particles in the dust cloud.
For video tape cameras particularly when in closer proximity to radioactive material,
the recording completely "glitches out" and is unviewable, probably unknown to the camera operator until later playback.
The following list of video links should be treated as a sample. Further, this paper may only reference one anomaly from the video, when many anomalies are present in the recording, all of which FGNW explains.
Dr. David Ray Griffin, the patron saint of the 9/11 Truth Movement, describes a third principle that is fundamental to the scientific method: "None of the relevant evidence should be ignored."
Most 9/11 theories ignore relevant evidence, such as the traces of fission and fusion documented in various reports, or many steel anomalous saved and videoed by FEMA/NIST, or radiation glitching the cameras.
When the capabilities of newer exotic nuclear weapons (FGNW) are properly understood, nearly all of the 9/11 anomalies are cast into the properly light, including the organized and coordinated deceit of government leaders and agencies, and corporate media to dissuade the public of nuclear conclusions.
Hide All /
Show
