Sunday, February 11, 2018

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

This article makes the prima facie case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11. "A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party."

Note: A 2016 version "Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW " has been circulated on various websites and Facebook groups catering toward 9/11 discussions. Neither those championing the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) nor those in various camps of 9/11 truth (e.g., nano-thermite, DEW) have disproved or rebutted FGNW. Many exhibit tactics & traits of a disinformationalist. Common features across many forums were mockery, game playing, and avoidance of objectively discussing any of the specifics presented in the establishment of the FGNW presumption, followed by eventual banishment from the forum.

Sunday, December 31, 2017

Trend line to shut down 9/11 nuclear considerations

Objective & rational thinkers know that if theory X is missing pieces, then further research into X is required before it can be deemed complete. If theory Y has X's missing pieces, then maybe X & Y ought to shack up for a bit to see if they are compatible.

The following are discussions to persuade Woodsian DEW supporters that shacking up with nuclear FGNW might complete and validate their theory.

These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line (exhibited even on Truth & Shadows) dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown using any and all of the available disinformation techniques, up to and including banishment.

Emails from T&S exile

Truth & Shadows run by Mr. Craig McKee has had me in exile. Several postings or comments over the year rose to the level where I thought I should respond, generally via email but sometimes by comments that have not been published. There is no small amount of irony between Mr. McKee's experiences in various Facebook discussion groups (e.g., trolled, banished) and my T&S tenure. Mr. McKee articulates his position on 9/11 nuclear devices (and by extension "me").

These discussions sadly add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be suppressed.

Minor points about 9/11

{mcb: Below are 9/11 discussion points of view that I am tired of repeating. Being a lazy hue-mahn, the carousel rides over repeated territory may now cause me to regurgitate the following.}

Thursday, June 9, 2016

Debunking NPT@WTC

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-Hole Warning! This entry publishes part 2 through part 4 as a continuation of Facebook (and email) discussions on the theme of NPT@WTC (no plane theory at the WTC on 9/11). As I wrote to Dr. James Henry Fetzer:

Debunking NPT at the WTC is not my 9/11 hobby-horse; FGNW is. I only do it as a favor to a fellow duped useful idiot who prides himself on being objective enough to let himself get duped another way with new informaion and/or properly applied science and logical analysis.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Censure on T&S

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-hole warning! Re-purposes discussions on Truth & Shadows that were of interest to me, even though I was in exile. Sometimes comments were authored by me even knowing that they might never be published until now.

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Attempts at Rational 9/11 Discussion

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

x1 Maxwell C. Bridges : Behold examples of disinformation in action


The following were attempts by me to have rational discussions about fourth generation nuclear devices on 9/11. Most of the parts in this article transpired on Facebook. By the very act of posting links to my blog article on FGNW, I attempted to move the discussion there. The following document many spins on the carousel.

Monday, June 6, 2016

Playing Disinfo Games

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

x2 Maxwell Bridges : Case study in a 9/11 disinformation operative


My debate opponents in the discussion below unravel as disinformation operatives. Although they call themselves a committee, it is clearly a team of members with different roles and rules of engagement in maintaining their agenda

Friday, March 11, 2016

Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW

Hide All / Expand All

This article makes the case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Devices (FGND) were used on September 11, 2001 at the World Trade Center. In doing so, it discusses why the leading theory of Nano-Thermite proposed by many influential leaders in the 9/11 Truth Movement does not go the whole distance and is therefore wrong. This work demonstrates evolution in the beliefs of the author when presented with new information, although much of this article's content has been published previously.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Another one discredits himself

Hide All / Expand All

Toggle - Part 1: Historical Exchanges with Mr. Ruff
Toggle - Part 2: Bloviating Mr. Ruff's Flumuxed 2nd Chance to ~not~ be a Hypocrite


Isaiah 42:16 "And I will bring the blind by a way that they know not; I will lead them in paths that they have not known: I will make darkness light before them, and the crooked things straight. These things will I do unto them, and not forsake them."

Legacy can be a bitch for disingenuous debaters. Legacy (or lack thereof) cuts them on the back-swing if they haven't been collecting and preserving their genius efforts made in other people's forums, because it can be disappeared and then nothing remains to substantiate them having supposedly made such stellar effort. Legacy (of others) can cut them on the fore-swing when someone else faithfully [OCD: el-oh-el] collects their words and handily proves them hypocrites, liars, weasels, game players, etc.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

Hypnotic Suggestion: Nuclear Case Closed

Hide All / Expand All

x18 Señor El Once: Intro: Hypnotic Nuclear Innuendo


If my discussions with Mr. Rogue were a tennis match with energetic back-and-forth volleys, I'd be saying -- and have for quite some time -- "the ball's in your court, love."

The way I see it, our many exchanges early in our relationship helped hone my case. This was laid down in two similar articles: 1. "Nuclear 2001-09-11", 2. "Nuclear 9/11/2001 (for VT)". Since then, my beliefs have deviated somewhat, but these remain core elements of 4th generation nukes. They have not been debunked point-by-point.

Mr. Rogue has authored some rebuttals over time, like a re-tread about the ten characteristics of controlled demolition. Unfortunately, none of the ten characteristics exclude the 4th generation nuclear devices that I am championing. I went through them point-by-point. In fact, the two articles above were built on substantiated rebuttals to Mr. Rogue's debunking efforts. The ball has been in Mr. Rogue's court for quite some time. *sigh*