Sunday, December 22, 2019

FGNW Discussions

The following discussions happened over a two year period primarily on Facebook, but also in other discussion forums and by e-mail. They were attempts by me to have rational discussions about 9/11 fourth generation nuclear devices, and tangentially about nano-thermite and about the "No Planes Theory" (NPT).

In most cases, my discussion partners resembled what a conspiracy theorist would expect as boots-to-the-ground infiltration of on-line forums, and controlling the message. Some are classic disinformation, defended poorly, unwilling to acknowledge weaknesses in premise, exhibiting in cases bot-tells in the engagement.

These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown.

Remnants of Truth & Shadows

Although I was in exile from Truth & Shadows, I was able to check in from time-to-time. I caught passages written by others worthy of preservation and response. Alas, my responses were written but had to wait for publication and exposure until now, except what could reach participants through email.

NPT and Internet Bots


Debunking NPT (No Planes Theory) isn't my hobby-horse. I do it more as a community service. I had been duped 2009-2012 by NPT as provided by September Clues and its crafty Parts 1 thru 9 and A thru H. But I was open-minded and objective with regards to further analysis and research, such that I acknowledged when pillars of my NPT beliefs were destroyed and I had to recant and apologize.

"Doing unto others, as I would have them do to me...". I did not relish having my "open-minded and objective" nature (e.g., super powers of being naive and trusting, until given reason not to) be taken advantage of. I want to spare my fellow yeomen in the 9/11 Truth Movement similar embarrassment for having been duped. So I've had more spins than necessary trying to set the record straight.

"And I would have succeeded to, were it not for those pesky [agents & bots]". This work contains NPT rounds 5 through 7. For completeness, the following has links to previous NPT rounds.

Sunday, February 11, 2018

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

This article makes the prima facie case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11. "A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party."

Note: A 2016 version "Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW " has been circulated on various websites and Facebook groups catering toward 9/11 discussions. Neither those championing the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) nor those in various camps of 9/11 truth (e.g., nano-thermite, DEW) have disproved or rebutted FGNW. Many exhibit tactics & traits of a disinformationalist. Common features across many forums were mockery, game playing, and avoidance of objectively discussing any of the specifics presented in the establishment of the FGNW presumption, followed by eventual banishment from the forum.

Sunday, December 31, 2017

Trend line to shut down 9/11 nuclear considerations

Objective & rational thinkers know that if theory X is missing pieces, then further research into X is required before it can be deemed complete. If theory Y has X's missing pieces, then maybe X & Y ought to shack up for a bit to see if they are compatible.

The following are discussions to persuade Woodsian DEW supporters that shacking up with nuclear FGNW might complete and validate their theory.

These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line (exhibited even on Truth & Shadows) dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown using any and all of the available disinformation techniques, up to and including banishment.

Emails from T&S exile

Truth & Shadows run by Mr. Craig McKee has had me in exile. Several postings or comments over the year rose to the level where I thought I should respond, generally via email but sometimes by comments that have not been published. There is no small amount of irony between Mr. McKee's experiences in various Facebook discussion groups (e.g., trolled, banished) and my T&S tenure. Mr. McKee articulates his position on 9/11 nuclear devices (and by extension "me").

These discussions sadly add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be suppressed.

Minor points about 9/11

{mcb: Below are 9/11 discussion points of view that I am tired of repeating. Being a lazy hue-mahn, the carousel rides over repeated territory may now cause me to regurgitate the following.}

Thursday, June 9, 2016

Debunking NPT@WTC

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-Hole Warning! This entry publishes part 2 through part 4 as a continuation of Facebook (and email) discussions on the theme of NPT@WTC (no plane theory at the WTC on 9/11). As I wrote to Dr. James Henry Fetzer:

Debunking NPT at the WTC is not my 9/11 hobby-horse; FGNW is. I only do it as a favor to a fellow duped useful idiot who prides himself on being objective enough to let himself get duped another way with new informaion and/or properly applied science and logical analysis.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Censure on T&S

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All

Rabbit-hole warning! Re-purposes discussions on Truth & Shadows that were of interest to me, even though I was in exile. Sometimes comments were authored by me even knowing that they might never be published until now.

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Attempts at Rational 9/11 Discussion

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All


x1 Maxwell C. Bridges : Behold examples of disinformation in action

2016-06-12

The following were attempts by me to have rational discussions about fourth generation nuclear devices on 9/11. Most of the parts in this article transpired on Facebook. By the very act of posting links to my blog article on FGNW, I attempted to move the discussion there. The following document many spins on the carousel.

Monday, June 6, 2016

Playing Disinfo Games

Show All Parts / Hide All Parts

Show All / Hide All


x2 Maxwell Bridges : Case study in a 9/11 disinformation operative

2016-06-13

My debate opponents in the discussion below unravel as disinformation operatives. Although they call themselves a committee, it is clearly a team of members with different roles and rules of engagement in maintaining their agenda