2025-12-11
This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions during 2025.
by Maxwell C. Bridges
2024-12-12
Spoiler: This article contains no sexual content... Except that if you read to its end, you may feel as if "blackhole #4" is a position for anal incest figuratively committed on your understanding of September 11, 2001 by entities whom you trusted and who should've known and responded better.
As the quarter century anniversary to 9/11 approaches, the relevance of 9/11 to today deserves to be questioned. Why should anyone tune any further mental wavelengths into considering the 9/11 events? The short answer is that even the understanding of the 9/11 Truth community was "restricted into a narrow range of acceptable debate." 101 In this context, "blackhole" refers to a topic that evades legitimate analysis and discussion, even though Truth demands it.
The justification for your consideration of the premises in this work:
This work aspires to be a scholarly effort into an "under-served" area of 9/11 research: the original World Trade Center Number Four (WTC-4), also known as the Southeast Plaza Building, that was seemingly destroyed by an approximately 30-story lattice of falling wall assemblies from one side of the WTC-2 tower.
WTC-4 is blackhole #4. The blackhole treatment was exhibited in how little analysis it generated by government agencies and 9/11 Truth groups who were charged with contemplating physics-compliant and reasonable explanations for the observed outcomes.
by Maxwell C. Bridges
2024-11-11
Email to: Roland Angle, CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
CC: Susan Serpa, Chris Begier, Craig McKee, Adam Ruff, Gene Laratonda, Ted Walter, Norman (9/11 Revisionist)
Dear Mr. Roland Angle,
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth) submitted a “request for correction” (RFC) to NIST's final report on World Trade Center Building 7 and filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging NIST's response. The goal was to force the agency to perform new analyses and develop a new "probable collapse sequence" that is physically possible and consistent with the available evidence.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
As a vetted member of ae911truth (under my Bruce Wayne) I have standing to submit a "Request for Correction" from ae911truth for:
* FAQ #14 (website) / FAQ #15 (PDF): Various authors claim that nuclear blasts caused or contributed to the WTC destruction. Why does AE911Truth not endorse this claim?
* FAQ #13: What is AE911Truth's assessment of the directed energy weapon (DEW) hypothesis?
2024-12-11
This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions from 2023-09 through 2024-12.
by Maxwell C. Bridges
2024-04-11
This is version 3.1 -- scaled-down to 2k-words and fixing broken image links -- of "9/11 Exotic Nuclear Weapons" submitted to the International Center for 9/11 Justice on 2024-08-25.
The destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001 was accomplished using "exotic," fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW). They were hybrid-fission/fusion and released 80% of their tactical nuclear yield as highly-energetic neutrons in a conic, targeted fashion, thus permitting multiple tandem devices.
2024-10-11
A fictional zoom meeting between characters based on real celebrities in the 9/11 Truth Movement. None of the real people name-dropped in this zoom-mockumentary said exactly or loosely the words that are attributed to them here. This is fiction, and yes, words are being shoved into their mouths that they didn't ever actually say. But those familiar with the real people upon whom this is based will probably agree that the fictional dialog is something in character for the real people and is probably something they wished to say. Why?
In terms of trying to have a rational and reasonable discussion:
"Reason wasn't working."
"Polite requests weren't working."
"Personal insults weren't working."
Let's try some mockery.
The 9/11 Truther celebrities being mocked in this theatrical drama in alphabetical order are:
by Maxwell C. Bridges
2023-11-11
Fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW) were used in the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. The evidence for nuclear components leaks out of the entire 9/11 record. The overkill energy of the observed sudden complete decimation of the towers is a clue, purposely missed.
This article re-purposes discussions about Masonry, the Pleiadians, and other insightful things.
This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions happened on Facebook between 2020-02 and 2020-08.
This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions happened on Facebook between 2021-08 and 2022-11.
This article defends the premise that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed as the primary mechanisms of destruction in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. Discussions from 2023-07 through 2023-10.
This article re-publishes Facebook exchanges from people associated with Mr. Craig McKee through his social media presence and blog.
by Maxwell C. Bridges
2023-10-01
This article spins a few times on the carousel called "no plane theory at the World Trace Center" (NPT@WTC), that I first took serious with September Clues.
Raw Nuclear DEW Research
Maxwell C. Bridges
2015-07-11
Expand All Part / Hide All Part
Expand All Sections / Hide All Sections
During a period of unemployment in 2015, I obtained a library card to my institution of higher education. This gave me access to not only their public bookstacks, but also to online repositories of information to which the library subscribed.
The goal of the research was to learn the approximate state of DEW and nuclear technology at the turn of the century (2000) from the public record. Literature searches were limited by date and topic. Much could be learned of the revelance of material from its abstract, which is generally easily accessible from repository search results and doesn't require going behind pay-walls (via a personally paid subsciption).
Online make it easy to simply create a list of everything coming from the search results. If interesting, copy what is relevant from its abstract. Deep-dive into the publication if the scent-of-the-information from the abstract deemed it worthy, and put those citations also into the list.
The following discussions happened over a two year period primarily on Facebook, but also in other discussion forums and by e-mail. They were attempts by me to have rational discussions about 9/11 fourth generation nuclear devices, and tangentially about nano-thermite and about the "No Planes Theory" (NPT).
In most cases, my discussion partners resembled what a conspiracy theorist would expect as boots-to-the-ground infiltration of on-line forums, and controlling the message. Some are classic disinformation, defended poorly, unwilling to acknowledge weaknesses in premise, exhibiting in cases bot-tells in the engagement.
These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown.
Although I was in exile from Truth & Shadows, I was able to check in from time-to-time. I caught passages written by others worthy of preservation and response. Alas, my responses were written but had to wait for publication and exposure until now, except what could reach participants through email.
Debunking NPT (No Planes Theory) isn't my hobby-horse. I do it more as a community service. I had been duped 2009-2012 by NPT as provided by September Clues and its crafty Parts 1 thru 9 and A thru H. But I was open-minded and objective with regards to further analysis and research, such that I acknowledged when pillars of my NPT beliefs were destroyed and I had to recant and apologize.
"Doing unto others, as I would have them do to me...". I did not relish having my "open-minded and objective" nature (e.g., super powers of being naive and trusting, until given reason not to) be taken advantage of. I want to spare my fellow yeomen in the 9/11 Truth Movement similar embarrassment for having been duped. So I've had more spins than necessary trying to set the record straight.
"And I would have succeeded to, were it not for those pesky [agents & bots]". This work contains NPT rounds 5 through 7. For completeness, the following has links to previous NPT rounds.
This article makes the prima facie case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11. "A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party."
Note: A 2016 version "Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW " has been circulated on various websites and Facebook groups catering toward 9/11 discussions. Neither those championing the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) nor those in various camps of 9/11 truth (e.g., nano-thermite, DEW) have disproved or rebutted FGNW. Many exhibit tactics & traits of a disinformationalist. Common features across many forums were mockery, game playing, and avoidance of objectively discussing any of the specifics presented in the establishment of the FGNW presumption, followed by eventual banishment from the forum.
Objective & rational thinkers know that if theory X is missing pieces, then further research into X is required before it can be deemed complete. If theory Y has X's missing pieces, then maybe X & Y ought to shack up for a bit to see if they are compatible.
The following are discussions to persuade Woodsian DEW supporters that shacking up with nuclear FGNW might complete and validate their theory.
These discussions add more data points to a particular trend line in the 9/11 realm. The trend line (exhibited even on Truth & Shadows) dictates that any attempts at objective & rational discussion into nuclear methods must be shutdown using any and all of the available disinformation techniques, up to and including banishment.
